Simple FTP by TomaWeb

"G" <anom@NoWhere.ocm> wrote:

>
>"Blinky the Shark" <no.spam@box.invalid> wrote in message
>news:Xns96F16D53D53DEbnooz@130.133.1.4...
>>G wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Blinky the Shark" <no.spam@box.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns96F0CF1015368bnooz@130.133.1.4...
>>>> Kramer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Any comments about Simple FTP by TomaWeb.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's name implies easy use. Anyone know anything about this
>>>>> FTP?
>>>>
>>>> When I was looking, I tried out SmartFTP, CuteFTP, and a couple
>>>> of others before settling on LeechFTP. Don't remember the pros
>>>> and cons; but there are a couple other names for you to check
>>>> out to see what you like best.
>>>
>>> I agree (Leech) is the best I tried... I tried a few more as
>>> well, I have to be honest I use - Leech, Dreamweaver or for
>>> quick and dirty one or two files, almost ashamed to admit it -
>>> Internet Explorer ....
>>
>> IE? Jeez -- you didn't have to be *that* honest.
>
>But it works, its often open and you can just type it in and copy and paste
>etc... yes - its limited, it often botches the job on larger jobs, but its
>just so quick and easy! Leech is by far the best, but I also tend to use
>DW - I used to hate it but had to use it in one work place, it works really
>well as long as your local site (test) and the server are pretty much the
>same in structure
>
http://stud.fh-heilbronn.de/~jdebis/leechftp/

--
Ed Jay (remove M to respond by email)