![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Web Design Forums and discussions on webdesign |
Web Design | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Civilians | rf wrote > andy_geordie wrote: > >> I will however keep a check on my site stats to see what percentage >> of people are using 800x600 and maybe switch to a wider layout (min >> 1024x768) at some point but there aren't many sites that have made >> that brave descision yet! > > Why not just build the site so that the size of your viewers browser > window is irrelevent. The size of their screen is *already* irrelevent > anyway. How are they irrelevant? What about someone viewing on a huge resolution in a maximised window? -- Charles Sweeney http://CharlesSweeney.com |
|
| | #16 (permalink) |
| Civilians | > LOL! Just noticed this: > > "<meta name="generator" content="Notepad and Andy Symonds aka > GeordieGeek" />" I forgot I added that LOL! Thanks for the nice comments and I have ammended the above generator tage so you can see my normal home page (this needs lots of work but I aint got time at the moment!) Andy |
|
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Civilians | andy_geordie wrote >> LOL! Just noticed this: >> >> "<meta name="generator" content="Notepad and Andy Symonds aka >> GeordieGeek" />" > > I forgot I added that LOL! > > Thanks for the nice comments and I have ammended the above generator > tage so you can see my normal home page (this needs lots of work but I > aint got time at the moment!) Another member of the Toon Army! Has Souness got the elbow yet? -- Charles Sweeney http://CharlesSweeney.com |
|
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Civilians | Charles Sweeney wrote: > rf wrote > > > andy_geordie wrote: > > > >> I will however keep a check on my site stats to see what percentage > >> of people are using 800x600 and maybe switch to a wider layout (min > >> 1024x768) at some point but there aren't many sites that have made > >> that brave descision yet! > > > > Why not just build the site so that the size of your viewers browser > > window is irrelevent. The size of their screen is *already* irrelevent > > anyway. > > How are they irrelevant? What about someone viewing on a huge > resolution in a maximised window? Yeah I could not agree more... I got a new PC for my birthday about a week ago and I have a 17 inch LCD screne with a resolution of 1024x768.... So sites that are only made for small resolutions have a lot of white space around the edges and do not look as they should. The colour contrast is a lot brighter as well!. Regards Chad http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc > > -- > Charles Sweeney > http://CharlesSweeney.com |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| One stop site for site validation? | Karim | Web Design | 0 | 08-02-2005 16:00 |
| New web site | Deliriuma | Web Design | 5 | 03-27-2005 16:00 |
| New web site... | Mc Designer | Web Design | 2 | 03-13-2005 20:00 |
| DAP on ISP Site ? | =?Utf-8?B?R2Vvcmdl?= | Web Design | 0 | 11-11-2004 22:55 |
| [MV] R/C B-52 Site | Gary Pavone | MV List | 0 | 09-19-2004 16:00 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |