Do you use Photoshop or Fireworks?

I'm a traditional Photoshop supporter, but I was wondering if you guys use
more Photoshop or Fireworks, or, who knows, something else

--
Charles.

Desenvolvimento e criação de sites: www.auriance.com
Hospedagem de sites e servidores dedicados: www.auriance.net

"Charles" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
newsp.sx4va0wfix6gqv@charles.mshome.net
> I'm a traditional Photoshop supporter, but I was wondering if you
> guys use more Photoshop or Fireworks, or, who knows, something else

I prefer Corel Photo-Paint. I've been using Corel products since day
one, and I'm too lazy to put in the effort required to learn Photoshop.

Besides, Photoshop is too big, too expensive and too slow, even on a
fast machine with lots of memory.

--
Red

And lo, Red E. Kilowatt didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:

> Besides, Photoshop is too big, too expensive and too slow, even on a
> fast machine with lots of memory.

Works just fine here at work. 1.4GHz with 384MB of RAM.

Of course, my computer at home is much better

Grey

--
The technical axiom that nothing is impossible sinisterly implies the
pitfall corollory that nothing is ridiculous.
- http://www.greywyvern.com/orca#ring - Orca Ringmaker: Host a webring
from your website!

Charles wrote:
> I'm a traditional Photoshop supporter, but I was wondering if you
> guys use more Photoshop or Fireworks, or, who knows, something else

I use a combination of software. Mostly Photoshop 7, Paint Shop Pro 8,
Corel Draw and Corel Photo Paint .10.

It really depends on what I'm working. You want the right tool for the job.

--
Lori
http://www.eYardsale.com

Charles me@privacy.net wrote in <op.sx4va0wfix6gqv@charles.mshome.net>:
>
> I'm a traditional Photoshop supporter, but I was wondering if you guys use
> more Photoshop or Fireworks, or, who knows, something else
>

Paint Shop Pro for little bits and bobs and a graphic designer who uses
Phtoshop for serious stuff. I know my limits and they are round about
where it starts being necessary to use something other than PSP.

--
eric
www.ericjarvis.co.uk
"live fast, die only if strictly necessary"

On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 1525 -0300, mbstevens
<NOXwebmasterx@xmbstevensx.com> wrote:

> For any image no larger than you would ever use on the web, Gimp is as
> good as Photoshop.

I tried Gimp last year - I found it horrible.

--
Charles.

Desenvolvimento e criação de sites: www.auriance.com
Hospedagem de sites e servidores dedicados: www.auriance.net

"GreyWyvern" <spam@greywyvern.com> wrote in message
newsp.sx4z0e0vsl6xfd@news.nas.net
> And lo, Red E. Kilowatt didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:
>
>> Besides, Photoshop is too big, too expensive and too slow, even on a
>> fast machine with lots of memory.
>
> Works just fine here at work. 1.4GHz with 384MB of RAM.

Do you go to the can or get coffee while you wait for the lifetime it
takes to load?

>
> Of course, my computer at home is much better
>
> Grey

Of course. :-)
--
Red