![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Web Design Forums and discussions on webdesign |
Web Design | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Civilians | Kim André Akerø wrote: > pr wrote: > >> Newsgroups have been archived since 1995 by DejaNews, later >> purchased by Google (2001?). > > Correct, they were acquired by Google in February 2001. It's the Google Crank, again. Killfile readjustment time! -- Blinky Linux Registered User 297263 Killing All Posts from GG: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.htm |
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Civilians | Blinky the Shark wrote: > It's the Google Crank, again. Killfile readjustment time! It was still in my killfile. His IP changes much less than his handle. -- Els http://locusmeus.com/ Sonhos vem. Sonhos vão. O resto é imperfeito. - Renato Russo - Now playing: Gary Moore - Parisienne Walkways (Live) |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Civilians | Els wrote: > Blinky the Shark wrote: > >> It's the Google Crank, again. Killfile readjustment time! > > It was still in my killfile. His IP changes much less than his handle. The server's XOVER database does not include fields that contain IP: <paste XOVER exchange from telnet session with server> xover 359048 224 359048 fields follow 359048 Tired of Google Groups archiving "pr" <pr@pr.com> Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:26:20 -0600 <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> 1732 17 Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.www.webmaster:359048 </paste> Thus, to filter on a header that includes his IP requires use of XHDR command: <paste XHDR exchange from telnet session with server> xhdr NNTP-Posting-Host <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> 221 0 NNTP-Posting-Host header of article <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net>. <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> 151.118.0.21 </paste> And this is "expensive" filtering, because it requires a separate request for XHDR headers. On a dialup, that's very time consuming and not acceptable. So that's not an option for some of us. -- Blinky Linux Registered User 297263 Killing All Posts from GG: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html |
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Civilians | Blinky the Shark wrote: > Els wrote: >> Blinky the Shark wrote: >> >>> It's the Google Crank, again. Killfile readjustment time! >> >> It was still in my killfile. His IP changes much less than his handle. > > The server's XOVER database does not include fields that contain IP: > > <paste XOVER exchange from telnet session with server> > > xover 359048 > 224 359048 fields follow > 359048 Tired of Google Groups archiving "pr" <pr@pr.com> > Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:26:20 -0600 <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> > 1732 17 Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.www.webmaster:359048 > > </paste> > > Thus, to filter on a header that includes his IP requires use of XHDR > command: > > <paste XHDR exchange from telnet session with server> > > xhdr NNTP-Posting-Host <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> > 221 0 NNTP-Posting-Host header of article <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net>. > <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> 151.118.0.21 > > </paste> > > And this is "expensive" filtering, because it requires a separate > request for XHDR headers. On a dialup, that's very time consuming and > not acceptable. So that's not an option for some of us. Okay. I have no idea about telnetting with a newsserver (my telnet experience doesn't go further than changing a setting in my router). My filter gui in Dialog lets me filter on anything that's in the headers. I'm guessing "xhdr" is included in what I call "the headers"? -- Els http://locusmeus.com/ Sonhos vem. Sonhos vão. O resto é imperfeito. - Renato Russo - Now playing: The Kinks - All Day And All Of The Night |
|
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Civilians | > > > >>>> It's the Google Crank, again. Killfile readjustment time! > > > >>> > > > >>> It was still in my killfile. His IP changes much less than his handle. > > > >> > > > >> The server's XOVER database does not include fields that contain IP: > > > >> > > > >> <paste XOVER exchange from telnet session with server> > > > >> > > > >> xover 359048 > > > >> 224 359048 fields follow > > > >> 359048 Tired of Google Groups archiving "pr" <pr@pr.com> > > > >> Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:26:20 -0600 <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> > > > >> 1732 17 Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.www.webmaster:359048 > > > >> > > > >> </paste> > > > >> > > > >> Thus, to filter on a header that includes his IP requires use of XHDR > > > >> command: > > > >> > > > >> <paste XHDR exchange from telnet session with server> > > > >> > > > >> xhdr NNTP-Posting-Host <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> > > > >> 221 0 NNTP-Posting-Host header of article <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net>. > > > >> <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> 151.118.0.21 > > > >> > > > >> </paste> > > > >> > > > >> And this is "expensive" filtering, because it requires a separate > > > >> request for XHDR headers. On a dialup, that's very time consuming and > > > >> not acceptable. So that's not an option for some of us. > > > > > > > > Okay. > > > > I have no idea about telnetting with a newsserver (my telnet > > > > experience doesn't go further than changing a setting in my router). > > > > My filter gui in Dialog lets me filter on anything that's in the > > > > headers. I'm guessing "xhdr" is included in what I call "the headers"? > > > > > > To anyone who's following this: IGNORE THAT REPLY. I answered about > > > the XOVER command, not the XHDR command that Els asked about. See, instead, > > > the CORRECTION I made in a reply to my own first reply to Els. Tnx. > > > > Hey, you are off topic. > > I can swear I am hearing four flies in this thread. One two three four. They are > talking close to each other. Quiet, quiet, quiet, SHQUAM. Hahahahahahahahahahaha. Its like Clint Eastwoods, they make their own justice, start talking about KKK killfies, then change the topic, and forget. But, its OK. I can take it. Hunting flies is the new game. Four little Clint Eastwoods down the toilet. Goodbye little ones. Flush, flush, down the drain, down the toilet drain, merrily merrily merrily merrily flush them down the drain. Four little big ones, I'll flush again you little Clint Eastwoods. You'll find plenty of food in your new home. |
|
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Civilians | > > > > >>>> It's the Google Crank, again. Killfile readjustment time! > > > > >>> > > > > >>> It was still in my killfile. His IP changes much less than his handle. > > > > >> > > > > >> The server's XOVER database does not include fields that contain IP: > > > > >> > > > > >> <paste XOVER exchange from telnet session with server> > > > > >> > > > > >> xover 359048 > > > > >> 224 359048 fields follow > > > > >> 359048 Tired of Google Groups archiving "pr" <pr@pr.com> > > > > >> Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:26:20 -0600 <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> > > > > >> 1732 17 Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.www.webmaster:359048 > > > > >> > > > > >> </paste> > > > > >> > > > > >> Thus, to filter on a header that includes his IP requires use of XHDR > > > > >> command: > > > > >> > > > > >> <paste XHDR exchange from telnet session with server> > > > > >> > > > > >> xhdr NNTP-Posting-Host <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> > > > > >> 221 0 NNTP-Posting-Host header of article <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net>. > > > > >> <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> 151.118.0.21 > > > > >> > > > > >> </paste> > > > > >> > > > > >> And this is "expensive" filtering, because it requires a separate > > > > >> request for XHDR headers. On a dialup, that's very time consuming and > > > > >> not acceptable. So that's not an option for some of us. > > > > > > > > > > Okay. > > > > > I have no idea about telnetting with a newsserver (my telnet > > > > > experience doesn't go further than changing a setting in my router). > > > > > My filter gui in Dialog lets me filter on anything that's in the > > > > > headers. I'm guessing "xhdr" is included in what I call "the headers"? > > > > > > > > To anyone who's following this: IGNORE THAT REPLY. I answered about > > > > the XOVER command, not the XHDR command that Els asked about. See, instead, > > > > the CORRECTION I made in a reply to my own first reply to Els. Tnx. > > > > > > Hey, you are off topic. > > > > I can swear I am hearing four flies in this thread. One two three four. They are > > talking close to each other. Quiet, quiet, quiet, SHQUAM. Hahahahahahahahahahaha. > > Its like Clint Eastwoods, they make their own justice, start talking about KKK killfies, > then change the topic, and forget. But, its OK. I can take it. > > Hunting flies is the new game. Four little Clint Eastwoods down the toilet. Goodbye > little ones. Flush, flush, down the drain, down the toilet drain, merrily merrily merrily merrily > flush them down the drain. Four little big ones, I'll flush again you little Clint Eastwoods. > You'll find plenty of food in your new home. Could you believe one day you are being thrown out of here, and you are the proven losers. |
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Civilians | > > > > > >>>> It's the Google Crank, again. Killfile readjustment time! > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> It was still in my killfile. His IP changes much less than his handle. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> The server's XOVER database does not include fields that contain IP: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> <paste XOVER exchange from telnet session with server> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> xover 359048 > > > > > >> 224 359048 fields follow > > > > > >> 359048 Tired of Google Groups archiving "pr" <pr@pr.com> > > > > > >> Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:26:20 -0600 <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> > > > > > >> 1732 17 Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.www.webmaster:359048 > > > > > >> > > > > > >> </paste> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thus, to filter on a header that includes his IP requires use of XHDR > > > > > >> command: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> <paste XHDR exchange from telnet session with server> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> xhdr NNTP-Posting-Host <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> > > > > > >> 221 0 NNTP-Posting-Host header of article <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net>. > > > > > >> <d%IZe.67$5u3.1344@news.uswest.net> 151.118.0.21 > > > > > >> > > > > > >> </paste> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> And this is "expensive" filtering, because it requires a separate > > > > > >> request for XHDR headers. On a dialup, that's very time consuming and > > > > > >> not acceptable. So that's not an option for some of us. > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay. > > > > > > I have no idea about telnetting with a newsserver (my telnet > > > > > > experience doesn't go further than changing a setting in my router). > > > > > > My filter gui in Dialog lets me filter on anything that's in the > > > > > > headers. I'm guessing "xhdr" is included in what I call "the headers"? > > > > > > > > > > To anyone who's following this: IGNORE THAT REPLY. I answered about > > > > > the XOVER command, not the XHDR command that Els asked about. See, instead, > > > > > the CORRECTION I made in a reply to my own first reply to Els. Tnx. > > > > > > > > Hey, you are off topic. > > > > > > I can swear I am hearing four flies in this thread. One two three four. They are > > > talking close to each other. Quiet, quiet, quiet, SHQUAM. Hahahahahahahahahahaha. > > > > Its like Clint Eastwoods, they make their own justice, start talking about KKK killfies, > > then change the topic, and forget. But, its OK. I can take it. > > > > Hunting flies is the new game. Four little Clint Eastwoods down the toilet. Goodbye > > little ones. Flush, flush, down the drain, down the toilet drain, merrily merrily merrily merrily > > flush them down the drain. Four little big ones, I'll flush again you little Clint Eastwoods. > > You'll find plenty of food in your new home. > > Could you believe one day you are being thrown out of here, and you are the proven losers. Your little toyground, is being guarded by a policeman now. Don't ever play in this playground big freaks. Do you hear, me sirs. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Tired of Google Groups archiving | pr | Web Design | 0 | 09-27-2005 20:00 |
| Re: Google should stop archiving | Charles Sweeney | Web Design | 9 | 06-20-2005 16:00 |
| Re: Google should stop archiving | Gandalf Parker | Web Design | 25 | 06-16-2005 16:00 |
| Re: Google should stop archiving | Trent Jones | Web Design | 9 | 06-16-2005 16:00 |
| Re: Google should stop archiving | Rastus | Web Design | 0 | 06-16-2005 00:00 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |