Nicknamezj wrote:
> I just looked at your link you gave under your name, and I saw you were
> using a strict.dtd, but your html is not using the strict.dtd rules.
I don't know what you mean. The page validates at HTML 4.01 Strict:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...2Fusability%2F
It has a few pointless empty <div>s which give HTML Tidy warnings, but
that doesn't make the code invalid (invalid code corresponds to HTML
Tidy errors, not warnings). Having said that, I should probably clear
those up, so thanks for drawing my attention to the issue.
Also, in future could you please quote the message to which you are
replying (especially important if its several days old)? I notice
you're using Google Groups, so this page will help:
http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/
--
Safalra (Stephen Morley)
http://www.safalra.com/hypertext/usability/