Personal: Google protest update

I have sent 30 protests, one by one to Google, to Google's customer services through the
past week. Each protest carefully constructed to bring an understanding by the 30'th protest
message of what Google represents in regards to people (or posters).

I claimed that Google crossed the lines of descent business conducts and territorially expanded
facelessly to mandate the population. Though unapparent to the ordinary beginner usenet user,
I have constructed a serious case worthy of a lawsuit.

Example of their "out of control" business behavior:

"When a user wishes to delete messages from the Google archive, they ask for a reason of
message removal.

Please consider that posters using other newsreaders have to provide explanations of why they
wish to remove messages from the Google archive.

Now isn't that unfair?

In article <UlbMe.105$N96.7718@news.uswest.net>, nomail@nomail.com
says...
> I have sent 30 protests, one by one to Google, to Google's customer services through the
> past week. Each protest carefully constructed to bring an understanding by the 30'th protest
> message of what Google represents in regards to people (or posters).
>
> I claimed that Google crossed the lines of descent business conducts and territorially expanded
> facelessly to mandate the population. Though unapparent to the ordinary beginner usenet user,
> I have constructed a serious case worthy of a lawsuit.
>
> Example of their "out of control" business behavior:
>
> "When a user wishes to delete messages from the Google archive, they ask for a reason of
> message removal.
>
> Please consider that posters using other newsreaders have to provide explanations of why they
> wish to remove messages from the Google archive.
>
> Now isn't that unfair?

They probably just think you're an idiot. Can't blame them for that,
can you?

--
Hywel
http://kibo.org.uk/

> I have sent 30 protests, one by one to Google, to Google's customer services through the
> past week. Each protest carefully constructed to bring an understanding by the 30'th protest
> message of what Google represents in regards to people (or posters).
>
> I claimed that Google crossed the lines of descent business conducts and territorially expanded
> facelessly to mandate the population. Though unapparent to the ordinary beginner usenet user,
> I have constructed a serious case worthy of a lawsuit.
>
> Example of their "out of control" business behavior:
>
> "When a user wishes to delete messages from the Google archive, they ask for a reason of
> message removal.
>
> Please consider that posters using other newsreaders have to provide explanations of why they
> wish to remove messages from the Google archive.
>
> Now isn't that unfair?


Spec:
How do I stand up against human rights violations? How? Google Groups Privacy Violations
created this psychological mess. I don't know. Google Groups should stop archiving.

That's how. Enough of the unique privacy violator: Google Groups.

I took this civil liberties case to Google. They crossed my lines of marketing descency. I go
and stop Google Groups from full archiving in the name of humanity. Can you believe it?
Its not bareable for those who change minds. Or hearts. They cannot "mediate" into people's
lives with their product. Its not allowed.

"Georgie Porgie, pudding and pie, had two kids and made them lie. But when the Googler
came out to play, Georgie Porgie porked his way. All the way to the courthouse! Porkhouse."

Johnny Depp misunderstood.... He thought he received a movie script. He loved it, and
decided to contact Georgie Porgie and make a movie out of it!

"Georgie Porgie pudding and pie,
had two kids and made them lie.
But when the Googler came out to play,
Georgie Porgie porked his way,
All the way to the courthouse!
Porkinghouse."

Johnny Depp joins Georgie on a journey to stop mean Googlers. They end up in a hilarious
journey, and end up humiliating Google headquarters at the end with a world-wide laughter
(promised?), by Googling the crap out of them inadvertantly for the whole world to see.
Georgie Porgie does not even realizes that... though he could not stop Google, he pulled
something on them: Yes. The entire attention of the people of the United States of America.

Flying in space on day, traveling to 2075 and meeting wallwalkers, going to other Galaxies
as Captain Georgie Porgie and Number One (as Johnny Depp), with a crew of 30 Mexican
genitor ladies... trapped on board before they pushed a button and set off to warp speed,
they hilariously tackle Googlers.

Sociological doctrine of Reality (Google and me)
-------------------------------------------------
Social standing: Google feels clean and higher level than me.

Me: I feel more intelligent, but knowing that my unclean approach here is looked
down on, because I seem not to take care of myself in their eyes. I represent a
minority here in their eyes, they consider themselves healthy.

I see myself as a socialogical slave (grave) of Google, living in a society which chose to
not accept Google for very clear reasons. Not because Google is racist toward me.
But because they are stupid.

The people chose to hire a human rights lawyer, and proceed with a civil lawsuit.

The lawsuit is not about me. Its about the people, in this case, the posters. That's why its a
civil lawsuit. When I am there, I will not think of myself and my personal problems. That
lawsuit is gonna be about that one issue: Why Google Groups violates human rights.

Lawsuit, court, issue, thoughts:
When I ask messages to be removed, why does the removal page ask me for the "reason" of
the removal of those messages. Its not Google's business what people post, especially not with
other newsreaders. They severely need to review their brains. I say so, because I see a big problem
in regards to humanity, and thus:

Really Sentencing Google in the name of humanity

Then I, a representative of humanity declare that Google Groups mandated into my life
without offering a contract to do so with their product. Google Groups conducts a neglegent
business inappropriate aptitude for creating an acceptable human intenet environment for all.
I refuse to accept otherwise.


Out of control business behavior must be whatever in the name of human and descency. I think
you think, we thought.

"Please consider that posters using other newsreaders have to provide explanations of why they
wish to remove messages from the Google archive?" Do you understand me?

Crimes against humanity. Why?
-------------------------------
Yes. Orwellian (1984)
Orwellian refers to "being on camera", and generally viewed as a Ceaucescuian dream of
watching people on the streets and is perceived in general as crimes against humanity. Consider
that People are even annoyed of traffic cameras. You have to respect people's wishes. Inability
to delete messages creates an orwellian atmosphere (hell). Anything you type is being recorded.
Its humanly wrong, what's worse, Google runs a crimes against humanity atmosphere. Did I say that
already? So, stop archiving unless you fully solve privacy problems first. That's what I tell them.
Google terrorizes the Internet - is what I would call them, a "Rodrian type record it all insanity
industry". You know Rodrian. If yes, Google is like him. Believe me.

Concluding something:
Ceaucescu didn't just install cameras on the streets for the secret service. Google doesn't install
binaculars for the secret service. Its not like that. But what I am talking about, is the "poster".
Noone else. Just posters, and their rights, and their feelings about a black and white environment.
Posters around the world. Posters. Posters. Posters are people. Googlers are not nice. A promote
a war, I do. Right Tony? The mob must think better.

Google Protester wrote:

> Get a brain.

Well, as opposed to you, I'm actually using my brain. Not just babbling
to myself, like you...

BTW, got LARTed by Quest yet?

Your turn,

A. Friend

"Hywel Jenkins" <hywel.jenkins@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d6d205a4687a63298973a@news.eclipse.net.u k...
> In article <UlbMe.105$N96.7718@news.uswest.net>, nomail@nomail.com
> says...
>> I have sent 30 protests, one by one to Google, to Google's customer
>> services through the
>> past week. Each protest carefully constructed to bring an understanding
>> by the 30'th protest
>> message of what Google represents in regards to people (or posters).
>>
>> I claimed that Google crossed the lines of descent business conducts and
>> territorially expanded
>> facelessly to mandate the population. Though unapparent to the ordinary
>> beginner usenet user,
>> I have constructed a serious case worthy of a lawsuit.
>>
>> Example of their "out of control" business behavior:
>>
>> "When a user wishes to delete messages from the Google archive, they ask
>> for a reason of
>> message removal.
>>
>> Please consider that posters using other newsreaders have to provide
>> explanations of why they
>> wish to remove messages from the Google archive.
>>
>> Now isn't that unfair?
>
> They probably just think you're an idiot. Can't blame them for that,
> can you?
>

Aye,
precisely what I was thinking... and that seems to be very fair.


--
"Tennis is a funny game; unbelievable highs and the lows are just as low..."
(JOHN MCENROE) BBC1

http://www.private-eye.co.uk

Mak wrote:

>>>
>>> Now isn't that unfair?
>>
>> They probably just think you're an idiot. Can't blame them for that,
>> can you?
>>
>
> Aye,
> precisely what I was thinking... and that seems to be very fair.
>
>

I just figured out (after previously killfiling gb7648@yahoo.com and
abc.friends@bigfoots.com) that if you killfile anything with the header
postings. Now, if everybody just refuses to respond to him...

--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
"Not all carcinogens are known to cause cancer in humans."
- Todd Benson, mailto:tbenson37@cox.net , Oct. 24, 2004

Robert Broughton <rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote in news:de34qm$hgu$2
@venn.bc.ca:

> I just figured out (after previously killfiling gb7648@yahoo.com and
> abc.friends@bigfoots.com) that if you killfile anything with the header
> postings. Now, if everybody just refuses to respond to him...


Wrong kind of troll for that. He isnt trolling for response. He is trolling
for traffic percentage. If all regulars killfile him then the group will
die from newbies not seeing anything but trash, and the regs wont see the
problem. Its happened in other newsgroups altho usually by alt.troll
players who crosspost to a score-count newsgroup. This guy seems to be on a
vendeta.

Thats OK. We have been killing his accounts one by one.

Gandalf Parker