Internet Archive being sued

Now if this doesn't just beat all ...

http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?s...27236&from=rss

Matt-the-Hoople wrote

> Now if this doesn't just beat all ...
>
> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?s...27236&from=rss

Reminds me of the person who sued (or was planning to sue) Google because
their site dropped in the ratings!

Sheer lunacy. All the archive is doing is showing that which was
previously made publiclly available.

--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com

Charles Sweeney wrote:

> Matt-the-Hoople wrote
>
>> Now if this doesn't just beat all ...
>>
>> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?s...27236&from=rss
>
> Reminds me of the person who sued (or was planning to sue) Google
> because their site dropped in the ratings!
>
> Sheer lunacy. All the archive is doing is showing that which was
> previously made publiclly available.

And if you become aware of the Internet Archive and don't want your
content in it, it's extremely easy to get your site removed from it.
http://www.archive.org/about/exclude.php

--
Chris Hope | www.electrictoolbox.com | www.linuxcdmall.com

after careful consideration, Charles Sweeney wrote in alt.www.webmaster

> Matt-the-Hoople wrote
>
>> Now if this doesn't just beat all ...
>>
>> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?s...27236&from=rss
>
>
> Sheer lunacy. All the archive is doing is showing that which was
> previously made publiclly available.
>
It's 'buffalo bagels'. So much for Dubya's clamp on frivolous litigation.