![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Web Design Forums and discussions on webdesign |
Web Design | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Civilians | I'm interested for hard linking with my site www.the-match.net If you are interested plese contact me by mail |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Civilians | Viper wrote: > Sokre wrote: >> I'm interested for hard linking with my site >> >> >> If you are interested plese contact me by mail > > Exchanging links no longer works. Nope - Google doesn't care about links anymore ![]() -- Tony Garcia Web Right! Development Riverside, CA www.WebRightDevelopment.com |
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Civilians | Tony wrote: > Viper wrote: >> Sokre wrote: >>> I'm interested for hard linking with my site >>> >>> >>> If you are interested plese contact me by mail >> >> Exchanging links no longer works. > > Nope - Google doesn't care about links anymore ![]() They do but they now give you a penalty for certain links. Also if they find you buying or trading links they can keep you out of the list. |
|
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Civilians | "arccos" <arccos@hotpop.com> wrote in news:1121453977.767175.187510 @z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com: > Ahh... so maybe that's why my site has gained a PR point... a change in > the model. :-) Thanks for the tip. Sad to hear blogs are becoming > "better" in Google's eyes. But I agree... link exchanges should be near > useless. I always theought they possibly underranked one-way links, but > that could lead to abuse with spammers triangulating links instead. From what I gather in their beta discussions they are TRYING to get Froogle to recognize and highly rank what would be considered good "shops" on the internet. The graphics, news, newsgroups, university, and "local content" databases are of course trying to rank things for that purpose. And Google is supposed to become the place that people look for answers on a subject. Of course things overlap. Shops for example can be found in all of them. But they dont want a shop shoving itself to the top of all the lists just to try and suck in more customers. > Well, all I know is they're smarter than me coming up with the model, > because Google is consistantly good. Yep! Its a continual battle but they are doing pretty good at it. The way they WANT it to work is that if someone puts in the word "hummingbird" they get a list of the best sites for hummingbirds. Not a shop, not one with a bunch of hummingbird graphics, not a team site which happens to be called "the hummingbirds". The fact that a high ranking hummingbird site also has a CafePress shop on the side selling posters or tshirts or mugs that they made (blatant link for credit if I sparked anyones interest: www.OddThotz.com/CafePress.html) is not a problem. I can see why forums and blogs are hit more but it might not last. I see too many people jumping on the blog wagon who have no idea what a blog is for. And now some shopkeepers are adding one as an easy-to-update billboard of new products because they know Google will visit it more often. Gandalf Parker |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Link Exchange Opportunities | abracad_1999@yahoo.com | Web Design | 6 | 07-29-2005 16:00 |
| 3 Link Exchange Methods | John | Web Design | 1 | 06-13-2005 00:00 |
| link exchange ww2 site | me | Hobbies | 0 | 05-25-2005 08:00 |
| Link Exchange | Jenny | Web Design | 38 | 05-06-2005 04:00 |
| Link exchange spam, cons | Matt Probert | Web Design | 2 | 12-03-2004 19:00 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |