![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Web Design Forums and discussions on webdesign |
Web Design | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Civilians | On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:44:14 +0000 (UTC), Jon Culshaw <jon.culshaw@btinternet.com> wrote: > Hi, > > If I add a 'links' pag to my company website, and place links to other > websites in return to links from my website will it help me in search > engines? Very minimally. The links will also be placed from trash "links pages", which are not ranked as high as the real pages. i |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Civilians | Jon Culshaw jon.culshaw@btinternet.com wrote in <d99qmd$stk$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>: > Hi, > > If I add a 'links' pag to my company website, and place links to other > websites in return to links from my website will it help me in search > engines? > Not really. DON'T add a "links page". Place links to other sites in categories by context and preferably alongside some relevant text and using relevant link text. The factors that will help your site in SEs are: outbound links to sites that the SE sees as relevant and authoritative outbound links that have keywords in the link text pages that have a consistent subject inbound links A "links page" is liable to be treated by search engines as largely irrelevant to the subject of your site. It won't do any harm as such, but it really isn't an effective use of your time compared to developing reciprocal links where your outbound link is placed within the context of the page and the reciprocal inbound link comes from a relevant page on the other site and has keywords in the link text. -- eric www.ericjarvis.co.uk "live fast, die only if strictly necessary" |
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Civilians | "Jon Culshaw" <jon.culshaw@btinternet.com> wrote in news:d99qmd$stk$1 @nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com: > If I add a 'links' pag to my company website, and place links to other > websites in return to links from my website will it help me in search > engines? It will for some. But you would do better if you learned to think like a search engine. Google for example is very popular because it WANTS to give searchers the best result for their search and its always changing its rating formula to do it. Also it changes because people learn to cheat the formula so it needs changed or Google would stop being popular. Links are now part of the formula because if I have a golfing site and 20 other sites link to me then I might be a decent site about golf. But people abused it so now Google tries to figure out if its 20 golfing sites that are linking to me. Anyway, instead of trying to force your way higher you would be better off trying to become the site they want on top. Anything else is only going to be temporary. Gandalf Parker |
|
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Civilians | In article <d99qmd$stk$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>, "Jon Culshaw" <jon.culshaw@btinternet.com> wrote: > If I add a 'links' pag to my company website, and place links to other > websites in return to links from my website will it help me in search > engines? If there's any justice, it will help you rank lower rather than higher. Any time to link away from your site, it implies you see the other site as more valuable than your own in some way. A search engine should see that and drop your ranking based on your own "advice". If another site links to you, it should drop as well. All the non-whoring sites would thus bubble up higher in the search results. |
|
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Civilians | > All the non-whoring sites would > thus bubble up higher in the search results. As would all sites with absolutely no value at all which is the reason why no-one links to them. Great idea - I can see you really thought this one through. |
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Civilians | In article <d9alsn$2pnc$1@bunyip2.cc.uq.edu.au>, "Rastus" <nospam@uq.edu.au> wrote: > > All the non-whoring sites would > > thus bubble up higher in the search results. > > As would all sites with absolutely no value at all which is the reason why > no-one links to them. Great idea - I can see you really thought this one > through. By what thought process did you conclude that sites with no value would properly be included in results? Remind me to never use any search engine you design. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RECIPROCAL LINK EXCHANGE FREE | me@you.com | Web Design | 1 | 06-05-2005 20:00 |
| Providing reciprocal links? | Ignoramus2605 | Web Design | 3 | 03-09-2005 00:00 |
| linking | timothy | Microsoft Applications | 1 | 02-09-2005 04:00 |
| Linking | Josh | Microsoft Applications | 1 | 06-16-2004 17:51 |
| De-linking via PPT? | Lisa | Microsoft Applications | 1 | 06-16-2004 13:59 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |