![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Web Design Forums and discussions on webdesign |
Web Design | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Civilians | OK, there appear to be three major Document Object Models for DHTML and JavaScript, document.layers -- Netscape document.all -- Micro$oft document.GetElementById -- W3C (used by Firefox, etc.) Trying to find information on the document.layers model, I continuously get directed to one or another page: http://developer.netscape.com/ which has stopped responding to http queries some time ago. (Lynx just times out trying to connect.) Micro$oft's site either has no downloadable references or they make them very hard to find. Instead, it is necessary to navigate through a maze of pages, one for each object, method, function, style, property, keyword or whatever that they support with their version of JavaScript -- thousands and thousands and thousands of tiny little pages. Finding JavaScript references that don't refer only to Netscape's and/or Micro$oft's implementations was a bit difficult but I eventually did find it W3C's DOM in downloadable format and have used the information in that to create JavaScript versions of the sliding-block puzzles[1] I designed. I thought it would be nice to support *all* browsers but then have learned from several sources that Netscape's new browser version is selectable to emulate Firefox or IE. No mention is made of it supporting the old Netscape standard. Then I found out in a newsgroup for the handicapped that Internet Explorer version 6 now supports the document.GetElementById model and that my puzzles work with IE 6. That suggests that it may be pointless to bother learning anything but the W3C DOM. So, should I bother at all to try to learn the document.layers and document.all methods of implementing DHTML or will the W3C DOM become supported enough that the other models become superfluous? [1] http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~af380/JSNSPuz.html http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~af380/MHPuzzle.html http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~af380/AMPuzzle.html -- Norman De Forest http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~af380/Profile.html af380@chebucto.ns.ca [=||=] (A Speech Friendly Site) Q. Which is the greater problem in the world today, ignorance or apathy? A. I don't know and I couldn't care less. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Extended Warrenty is it worth it , have you gotten your moneys worth out of it ? | C. E. White | Automotive | 15 | 08-22-2005 04:00 |
| 3400 V6 - differences between 96-99 versions and 2000+ versions | ohcrap@gmail.com | Automotive | 0 | 07-22-2005 20:00 |
| Re: Extended Warrenty is it worth it , have you gotten your moneys worth out of it ? | C. E. White | Automotive | 4 | 07-21-2005 12:00 |
| Re: Extended Warrenty is it worth it , have you gotten your moneys worth out of it ? | Automotive | 0 | 07-18-2005 16:00 | |
| Re: Extended Warrenty is it worth it , have you gotten your moneys worth out of it ? | Automotive | 0 | 07-18-2005 12:00 | |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |