![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Web Design Forums and discussions on webdesign |
Web Design | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Civilians | "Norman L. DeForest" <af380@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in news:Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1050501171609.12880B-100000@halifax.chebucto.ns. ca: > > [quoting trevor's original post without comment with > alt.comp.blind-users, alt.disability.blind.social and > alt.html.web-accessibility added to the distribution.] > > Question, should followups be to alt.www.webmaster where the thread > started or would alt.html.web-accessibility be more appropriate (and > put some life back into that newsgroup)? No followups currently set. > that's a darn good idea. maybe we should move the whole show over there. anyone else? |
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Civilians | On Wed, 04 May 2005 14 49 -0000, trevor <not@your.house> wrote:>"Norman L. DeForest" <af380@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in >news:Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1050501171609.12880B-100000@halifax.chebucto.ns. >ca: > >> >> [quoting trevor's original post without comment with >> alt.comp.blind-users, alt.disability.blind.social and >> alt.html.web-accessibility added to the distribution.] >> >> Question, should followups be to alt.www.webmaster where the thread >> started or would alt.html.web-accessibility be more appropriate (and >> put some life back into that newsgroup)? No followups currently set. >> > >that's a darn good idea. maybe we should move the whole show over there. >anyone else? I'd prefer that it stay here. I would certainly find it helpful, and the last thing I need is to be subscribed to more newsgroups! Besides, this is important info for people who wouldn't think to go to the accessibility newsgroups - after all, you want to reach them and not just preach to the converted. MGW |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Civilians | "Norman L. DeForest" <af380@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in news:Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1050504122408.1007D-100000@halifax.chebucto.ns.ca: > SUB alt.comp.accessibility > SUB alt.html.web-accessibility > free.it.accessibilita.ciechi > free.it.comp.accessibilita.ciechi > it.comp.accessibilita > microsoft.public.accessibility.axa > microsoft.public.accessibility.developer > microsoft.public.accessibility.ieaccess > microsoft.public.accessibility.issues > SUB netscape.public.mozilla.accessibility > well, alt.html.web-accessibility sounds like a more appropriate group. should be wait around to see if my host will add it or just take over alt.comp.accessibility? i don't think anyone will mind, it's not like they are using it for anything.... |
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Civilians | MGW <mgw1979@hotmail.com> wrote in news:sqqh71tq5oa06iljjdp55gf02ipmfqm9nm@ 4ax.com: > On Wed, 04 May 2005 14 49 -0000, trevor <not@your.house> wrote:> >>"Norman L. DeForest" <af380@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in >>news:Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1050501171609.12880B-100000@halifax.chebucto.ns. >>ca: >> >>> >>> [quoting trevor's original post without comment with >>> alt.comp.blind-users, alt.disability.blind.social and >>> alt.html.web-accessibility added to the distribution.] >>> >>> Question, should followups be to alt.www.webmaster where the thread >>> started or would alt.html.web-accessibility be more appropriate (and >>> put some life back into that newsgroup)? No followups currently set. >>> >> >>that's a darn good idea. maybe we should move the whole show over there. >>anyone else? > > I'd prefer that it stay here. I would certainly find it helpful, and > the last thing I need is to be subscribed to more newsgroups! > > Besides, this is important info for people who wouldn't think to go to > the accessibility newsgroups - after all, you want to reach them and > not just preach to the converted. > > MGW > > yeah, but we can drop in with updates from time to time. the point about reinvigorating another group--and such an important group--is well made. |
|
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Civilians | On Thu, 05 May 2005 00:40:53 -0000, trevor <not@your.house> wrote: >> Besides, this is important info for people who wouldn't think to go to >> the accessibility newsgroups - after all, you want to reach them and >> not just preach to the converted. >> >> MGW > >yeah, but we can drop in with updates from time to time. the point about >reinvigorating another group--and such an important group--is well made. Please do give periodic updates - they'd be much appreciated. MGW |
|
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Civilians | trevor wrote: > MGW <mgw1979@hotmail.com> wrote in news:sqqh71tq5oa06iljjdp55gf02ipmfqm9nm@ > 4ax.com: > >> On Wed, 04 May 2005 14 49 -0000, trevor <not@your.house> wrote:>> >>>"Norman L. DeForest" <af380@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in >>>news:Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1050501171609.12880B-100000@halifax.chebucto.ns. >>>ca: >>> >>>> >>>> [quoting trevor's original post without comment with >>>> alt.comp.blind-users, alt.disability.blind.social and >>>> alt.html.web-accessibility added to the distribution.] >>>> >>>> Question, should followups be to alt.www.webmaster where the thread >>>> started or would alt.html.web-accessibility be more appropriate (and >>>> put some life back into that newsgroup)? No followups currently set. >>>> >>> >>>that's a darn good idea. maybe we should move the whole show over there. >>>anyone else? >> >> I'd prefer that it stay here. I would certainly find it helpful, and >> the last thing I need is to be subscribed to more newsgroups! >> >> Besides, this is important info for people who wouldn't think to go to >> the accessibility newsgroups - after all, you want to reach them and >> not just preach to the converted. > > yeah, but we can drop in with updates from time to time. the point about > reinvigorating another group--and such an important group--is well made. Why not let the thread run in two groups at the same time? As long as it's on topic for both a.w.w. and an accessibility group, there is no need to set a follow-up afaik. I follow both aww and alt.html.web-accessibility, but I'd like to see this thread stay in aww as well, especially cause that way more webmasters are informed of what accessibility really means. People don't hang around in accessibility groups if they're not already interested in the subject, so I think it's good the thread stays here in a.w.w., and it would also be good to have it in an accessibility group as well, to get feedback from people who already know more about it. -- Els http://locusmeus.com/ Sonhos vem. Sonhos vão. O resto é imperfeito. - Renato Russo - Now playing: Bodysnatchers - Ruder Than You |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Blind user 2 | jake | Web Design | 12 | 05-05-2005 08:00 |
| Blind user critique | trevor | Web Design | 15 | 05-03-2005 20:00 |
| Re: Blind user 2 | trevor | Web Design | 1 | 05-03-2005 20:00 |
| Re: Blind user 2 update: test web page launched. | trevor | Web Design | 0 | 05-03-2005 20:00 |
| Re: Blind user 2 | Toby Inkster | Web Design | 1 | 05-01-2005 20:00 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |