worrying site?

http://bugmenot.com/

WhAtEvEr wrote:

> http://bugmenot.com/

I'm regestered at the New York Times, but now and then I try bugmenot
usr/pwd pairs as testing. They very rarely work. It looks to me like
they (and probably other popular - and clued - site maintainers) don't
run through bugmenot (you can get more than one pair, if more have been
submitted[1]) and weed those out of their databases.

[1]You click a link that says something like "that one didn't work", and
you get a new pair; you can keep doing that.

--
Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
Who has implemented Usenet Solution #45933:
Now killing all posts originating at Google Groups

Blinky the Shark wrote:
> WhAtEvEr wrote:

>> http://bugmenot.com/

> I'm regestered at the New York Times, but now and then I try bugmenot
> usr/pwd pairs as testing. They very rarely work. It looks to me like
> they (and probably other popular - and clued - site maintainers) don't

Dele "don't" -- it's a thinko. It looks like they DO check bugmenot.

> run through bugmenot (you can get more than one pair, if more have been
> submitted[1]) and weed those out of their databases.

> [1]You click a link that says something like "that one didn't work", and
> you get a new pair; you can keep doing that.

--
Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
Who has implemented Usenet Solution #45933:
Now killing all posts originating at Google Groups