Worst website??

Was wondering what the worst website for aesthetics and content was and
landed upon this thinking it may be a strong contender

http://www.agentsundercover.co.uk/

Apart from posessing some scary looking images, like the girl with one eye
larger than the other (a dabble at photoshop perhaps), the page title
offering to sort out your "priviate functions" Check out the demo "dont be
stupid". This sounds like something you would normarily find at a caravan
site club house that has three elderly guests.
Just had another look at the site..as to the noise, all is explained

"Haley is an experienced vocalist having performed both as a solo singer and
with bands. She first started singing semi-professionally as a solo singer,
after doing a season with Pontins holiday camp as a Bluecoat "

"WhAtEvEr" <whatever@Ihavenothingtodeclareexceptmygenius.co.u k> skrev i
melding news:Ol9Td.705$gf1.371@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
> Was wondering what the worst website for aesthetics and content was and
> landed upon this thinking it may be a strong contender
>
> http://www.agentsundercover.co.uk/

Pfft, that's nothing. Take a look at this site for a Norwegian electronics
vendor:
http://www.arngren.net/

And worse:
http://www.arngren.net/index-ny-kopi2.html
(subpage from the above)

And there's plenty of bad sites out there...

--
Kim André Akerø
- kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com
(remove NOSPAM to contact me directly)

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:41:12 GMT, "Kim André Akerø"
<kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com> found these unused words floating about:

>"WhAtEvEr" <whatever@Ihavenothingtodeclareexceptmygenius.co.u k> skrev i
>melding news:Ol9Td.705$gf1.371@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
>> Was wondering what the worst website for aesthetics and content was and
>> landed upon this thinking it may be a strong contender
>>
>> http://www.agentsundercover.co.uk/
>
>Pfft, that's nothing. Take a look at this site for a Norwegian electronics
>vendor:
>http://www.arngren.net/
>
>And worse:
>http://www.arngren.net/index-ny-kopi2.html
>(subpage from the above)
>
>And there's plenty of bad sites out there...

All the worst start with a full page "FLASH" in the pan.

WhAtEvEr wrote:

> http://www.agentsundercover.co.uk/

Must have been designed by...
http://www.lbwebs.co.uk/

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact

J. A. Mc. wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:41:12 GMT, "Kim André Akerø"
> <kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com> found these unused words floating about:
>
>
>>"WhAtEvEr" <whatever@Ihavenothingtodeclareexceptmygenius.co.u k> skrev i
>>melding news:Ol9Td.705$gf1.371@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
>>
>>>Was wondering what the worst website for aesthetics and content was and
>>>landed upon this thinking it may be a strong contender
>>>
>>>http://www.agentsundercover.co.uk/
>>
>>Pfft, that's nothing. Take a look at this site for a Norwegian electronics
>>vendor:
>>http://www.arngren.net/

How about:

<http://80.7.210.174/ojb/indexa.html>

"Please Scroll Down
and allow time for all my icons
to load to get the full benefit of this page. "

--
Matt Bradley
"Myths which are believed in tend to become true"
-George Orwell

I thought it was another american bas****isation of the word "private"
initially! lol

"John Seeliger" <jseelige@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:38944cF5h4pidU1@individual.net...
> "WhAtEvEr" <whatever@Ihavenothingtodeclareexceptmygenius.co.u k> wrote in
> message news:Ol9Td.705$gf1.371@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
>> the page title offering to sort out your "priviate functions"
>
> You mean that is not the correct British spelling?
>
> --
> http://www.johnstexas.com http://stores.ebay.com/Johnstexas
>

GreyWyvern wrote:
> And lo, mbstevens didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:
>
>> GreyWyvern wrote:
>>
>>> What iframe? I have them disabled. :P
>>
>>
>> Wish I could do that in Firefox.
>
>
> Don't you have a user stylesheet?
>
> body iframe {
> display:none !important;
> }
>
> Grey
>
Nice. I find those things really irritating, even when done "right."