![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Web Design Forums and discussions on webdesign |
Web Design | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Civilians | webdev wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a newcomer to frames and have a client who wants to use frames (to keep > advertising banners in view) - > > Can a framed site be made W3C valid markup? > > Thanks in advance > Rae MacLeman > > > > Yes, but there are thousands of reasons not to. Firstly, many browsers prevent banner adverts being displayed, so it'd be pointless. Frames would totally screw the indexing of your clients site with search engines (unless you are careful) and make it almost impossible for someone to bookmark any page inside the site apart from the index page... which kind of sucks. Scroll back through the history of this newsgroup and you can see hundreds of discussions on the subject. -- x theSpaceGirl (miranda) # lead designer @ http://www.dhnewmedia.com # # remove NO SPAM to email, or use form on website # |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Civilians | On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08 58 -0000, webdev <someone@microsofdt.com> wrote:> Hi, > > I'm a newcomer to frames and have a client who wants to use frames (to > keep > advertising banners in view) - Unwise. 1) User-unfriendly design 2) Ad banners come off as sleazy to many users, and always-on-top is really annoying. 3) Other techniques can be used to do it better. Like position: fixed, and Javascript for IE. > Can a framed site be made W3C valid markup? Of course. But more important than validity is suitability, and framesets are generally unsuitable for a corporate website. |
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Civilians | SpaceGirl wrote: > webdev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm a newcomer to frames and have a client who wants to use frames (to >> keep advertising banners in view) - Can a framed site be made W3C valid >> markup? Thanks in advance Rae MacLeman > Yes, but there are thousands of reasons not to. > Firstly, many browsers prevent banner adverts being displayed, so it'd > be pointless. I'd like to know which ones do this. Then how would the browser know the content of the "banner" frame? Some sites like geocities.com use popups for various reasons other than advertising. Even though frames are frowned upon, it is still a part of valid and current html standards so the browser has to support them in every way. |
|
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Civilians | On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08 58 -0000, webdev <someone@microsofdt.com> wrote:> Hi, Hidey-ho. > I'm a newcomer to frames and have a client who wants to use frames (to > keep advertising banners in view) - It doesn't matter, I won't see any of them. > Can a framed site be made W3C valid markup? Unless you're a genius, (and I *don't* mean this in a rude way at all) if you use frames you'll just end up making the page look like it was written by a twelve year old making his first site on Geocities. It's time to explain the benefits of server-side templates to your client. Grey -- The technical axiom that nothing is impossible sinisterly implies the pitfall corollory that nothing is ridiculous. - http://www.greywyvern.com - Orca Knowledgebase: Completely CSS styleable Knowledgebase/FAQ system |
|
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Civilians | On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19 18 +0000, SpaceGirl<NOtheSpaceGirlSPAM@subhuman.net> wrote: > FireFox, AvantBrowser, Opera, Mozilla - they all have advert blockers > and popup blockers by default. Popup blockers, yesh; not advert blockers though. With Firefox installing the ad-blocker extension requires some clicking via and menu-system, and it would be silly for Opera, an ad-supported browser, to package an ad-blocker along with their software. You can download a number of third-party apps to block ads for any browser though. Grey -- The technical axiom that nothing is impossible sinisterly implies the pitfall corollory that nothing is ridiculous. - http://www.greywyvern.com - Orca Knowledgebase: Completely CSS styleable Knowledgebase/FAQ system |
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Civilians | Richard wrote: > SpaceGirl wrote: > > >>webdev wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I'm a newcomer to frames and have a client who wants to use frames (to >>>keep advertising banners in view) - Can a framed site be made W3C valid >>>markup? Thanks in advance Rae MacLeman > > >>Yes, but there are thousands of reasons not to. > > >>Firstly, many browsers prevent banner adverts being displayed, so it'd >>be pointless. > > > I'd like to know which ones do this. > Then how would the browser know the content of the "banner" frame? > Some sites like geocities.com use popups for various reasons other than > advertising. > > Even though frames are frowned upon, it is still a part of valid and current > html standards so the browser has to support them in every way. > > FireFox, AvantBrowser, Opera, Mozilla - they all have advert blockers and popup blockers by default. Also, by default, Internet Explorer 6 SP2 also blocks popup windows, so immediately if your site is using SCRIPTED popup windows, I suspect a lot of people (possibly most? Depends how many people applies SP2) wont see them. Frames are supported by almost all browsers, and not blocked by any (any that I know of, and any that matter for the average audience [accessibility being accepted exception]) -- x theSpaceGirl (miranda) # lead designer @ http://www.dhnewmedia.com # # remove NO SPAM to email, or use form on website # |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Offline XHTML validator ? | Justin Sane | Web Design | 7 | 06-27-2005 20:00 |
| Re: recursive HTML validator app? | Toby Inkster | Web Design | 0 | 10-25-2004 08:00 |
| Frames! Glorious frames! | Toby Inkster | Web Design | 71 | 07-28-2004 20:02 |
| Frames! Glorious frames! | Toby Inkster | Web Design | 0 | 07-28-2004 00:57 |
| W3C Markup Validator Upgraded | Arne | Web Design | 3 | 06-15-2004 11:03 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |