![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Web Design Forums and discussions on webdesign |
Web Design | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Civilians | "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in message news:<Q_Ved.20754$JS4.16680@twister.nyroc.rr.com>. .. > Quoth the raven Jennifer: > > > "T.J." <no1@home.invalid> wrote in message > > news:<ckpb8b$q7s$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk>... > > > >> Until recently, I always had a screen resolution of 800/600 I > >> have just started using 1024/768 and notice a lot of sites where > >> they have a large blank area on the right. A perfect example is, > >> www.digitalpoint.com > >> > >> I personally prefer sites like this, as I often surf with only > >> 3/4 of the browser open, whilst fiddling with other things in the > >> space. > > >> Is this the acceptable way of designing sites though? > > Make your site float to fill the available viewport area, instead of > designing to a resolution. Screen resolution is unimportant; browser > window size is, sorta. Your site should not care what the window size is. > > > You can create what is called a fliud web page that scale the > > entire screen no matter what resolution the users uses. You can do > > this with tables and setting the width to be 100%. > > http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?Tableless_layouts > > > See the following site for an example: > > > > http://www.peostri.army.mil > > I would not recommend that site as a viable example of good web > design. I'm glad I don't have to maintain it. > > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...ri.army.mil%2F I did not say it was good design, but an example of fluid design. |
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Civilians | Quoth the raven Jennifer: > "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote > >> Quoth the raven Jennifer: >> >>> See the following site for an example: >>> >>> http://www.peostri.army.mil >> >> I would not recommend that site as a viable example of good web >> design. I'm glad I don't have to maintain it. >> >> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...ri.army.mil%2F > > I did not say it was good design, but an example of fluid design. Wouldn't you rather cite an example of a good design, so that readers can practice good coding as well as fluid design? That army site has tables nested three-deep! Fluid design, no tables: http://www.fingerlakesbmw.org/ -- -bts -This space intentionally left blank. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| screen resolution | JClark | Microsoft Applications | 4 | 08-12-2005 00:00 |
| Screen resolution detection | John Whitworth | Web Design | 0 | 04-12-2005 16:00 |
| Need Help - Improving Resolution from Print Screen | Peter Syvertsen | Microsoft Applications | 4 | 07-10-2004 01:21 |
| Need better Resolution importing from Print Screen | Peter Syvertsen | Microsoft Applications | 1 | 07-10-2004 01:21 |
| Graphics in Powerpoint 'breaking up' when screen resolution is cha | JulieG | Microsoft Applications | 1 | 06-17-2004 16:09 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |