Jihad in the U.S. -- Oh, yes, it's underway here too...

[Snowden]

Iranian News Agency delighted that Obama says US should "ratchet down" rhetoric on Iran


Naivete. "Obama: Harsh US Rhetoric on Iran Boosting Oil Prices," from Iran's Fars News Agency, July 8 (thanks to Gateway Pundit):

TEHRAN (FNA)- Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said on Monday that harsh US rhetoric toward Iran appeared to be contributing to the surge in oil prices and that a calmer approach might help soothe the markets.

Obama was asked in a news conference about some ways that the United States could help reduce the price of oil in the short term.

The Illinois senator listed some of his energy proposals such as a plan to rein in excessive speculation in the energy markets.

"There are some geopolitical issues that affect the price of oil," he added. "So for us to ratchet down the rhetoric when it comes to Iran, for example, and engage in tough, principled diplomacy, as I've called for, might calm the markets down."...

And might give away the store.



Jihad Watch: Iranian News Agency delighted that Obama says US should "ratchet down" rhetoric on Iran

[Snowden]

Georgia honor killer says he did nothing wrong, demands Islamic food in prison


No pork, please


Contrary to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution headline, he didn't actually say he was innocent. He said he had done nothing wrong. That's not the same thing. According to an earlier story on this case, he confessed to killing his daughter, and explained that he had done it to cleanse his family's honor. When he appeared before the judge, it is unlikely that he changed this story. He just said he didn't do anything wrong. And by the lights of the Islamic culture from which he comes, which thinks that a father killing a daughter who has sullied his family's honor is perfectly justified, he indeed hasn't done anything wrong.

His demand for halal food, meanwhile, is bitterly ironic in light of the PC blackout in the mainstream media on any mention of the Islamic character of this murder. CNN went searching for clues as to why it happened in South Asian culture. The Chicago Tribune searched for motivations among the practices of long-dead European royalty. On Beck, Zuhdi Jasser dismissed it as a "pre-Islamic" practice.

The price of this politically correct refusal to confront the ugly realities of the Islamic link to honor killing will be, quite simply, more honor killings. No one will call upon Islamic groups to do something about this practice. No special scrutiny will be focused upon Muslims in the United States, or any studies undertaken about how honor killings can be prevented. No one will examine the question of unrestricted Muslim immigration in light of this problem. While learned analysts search for clues in South Asian cultural habits and the practices of European royalty, more young women will be murdered by their Muslim fathers, husbands, and brothers to cleanse their family’s honor. These young women are the ultimate victims of political correctness.

"I'm innocent, says man held in daughter's death: Chaudhry Rashid wants to observe Muslim beliefs while jailed," by Kathy Jefcoats for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. July 8:

A Pakistani man accused of killing his daughter five days after she filed for divorce to end her arranged marriage wept in court Tuesday, telling a Clayton County magistrate he is innocent.

"I have done nothing wrong," Chaudhry Rashid told Chief Magistrate Daphne Walker through interpreter Younis Farhat. Farhat said Rashid speaks primarily Urdu and Punjabi.

But police say Rashid, 54, used a bungee cord to strangle Sandeela Kanwal, 25, early Sunday morning in the family's Utah Drive home in Jonesboro.

Rashid, who is being held without bond, told the judge he wanted to observe his Muslim beliefs in the Clayton jail. He wants to follow a diet that forbids the consumption of pork in any form and requires other meats are prepared according to Islamic rules.

[...]

In court, Rashid made guttural noises and cried. He rocked back and forth and appeared to be talking to himself before the hearing started. Through Farhat, Rashid told Walker he was mourning the loss of his daughter.

"My daughter just died and I am not in a state of mind to ask any questions," he said.

We have seen the Islamic displacement of responsibility and utter incapacity for self-criticism before, but this one really takes the cake.



Jihad Watch: Georgia honor killer says he did nothing wrong, demands Islamic food in prison

[Snowden]

Gun battle at US consulate in Constantinople: "Terrorists, with beards and long hair"


Shootout in Occupied Constantinople. "Turkey shooting: Six dead in US consulate attack in Istanbul," from the Telegraph, July 9 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Three policemen and three unidentified gunmen have been killed during a 15-minute gun battle at the United States consulate in Istanbul.

Three gunmen stormed a guard post near the main entrance of the high-walled compound, reportedly shooting a Turkish police officer in the head.

A full-scale gun battle then erupted at the heavily-guarded compound, ending in the deaths of the three assailants. The city’s governor, Muammer Guler, said a police officer had died at the scene while two others died of their wounds soon after in hospital....

Witness Yavuz Erkut Yuksel said the attackers emerged from a white vehicle and surprised the officer at the guard post. “One of them approached a policeman while hiding his gun and shot him in the head,” he said.

Another witness described the attackers as “terrorists, with beards and long hair.”...

Jihad Watch: Gun battle at US consulate in Constantinople: "Terrorists, with beards and long hair"

[Snowden]

The Libel Tourist


An illuminating film on the Rachel Ehrenfeld case:

This documentary short film, produced by the Moving Picture Institute, shows how Saudi billionaire Khalid Bin Mafhouz exploits the British legal system and sues for libel whenever he is the subject of a terrorism accusation.

Directed by MPI fellow Jared Lapidus, the film explains how Mahfouz filed a libel suit against Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, author of Funding Evil; How Terrorism is Financed -- and How to Stop It. The suit was not filed in the United States, where the book was published and sold, but instead in London, where Mahfouz associates ordered 23 copies online. The judge ordered all copies of the book pulped, and ordered Ehrenfeld to pay the legal fees and damages, despite the fact that nothing in her book about Saudi funding of terrorism was ever disproved.

Ehrenfeld, however, is fighting back. In The Libel Tourist she speaks about her shocking experience of modern-day book burning by British courts, and the First Amendment lawsuit she filed against Mahfouz. Her law suit was the impetus for "Rachel's Law" -- in March 31, 2008, the New York State Legislature unanimously passed -- the Libel Terrorism Protection Act To Protect American Journalists and Authors From Overseas Defamation Lawsuits. With the new law on her side, Dr. Ehrenfeld is heading back to court to win her lawsuit against bin Mahfouz.

In MAY 2008, the the NATIONAL version of New York State's "Rachel's Law" -- THE FREE SPEECH PROTECTION ACT (S-2977 & H.R. 5814) was introduced by Reps. Peter King (R-NY) & Anthony Weiner (D-NY) and Sens. Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) & and Arlen Specter (R-PA). The bill has been assigned to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.

If free speech is important to you, contact the House and Senate Judiciary Committee Members and staff and urge them to approve the bill and vote for its passage as soon as possible. Helping Dr. Ehrenfeld is helping each and every American – including YOU! To Donate & Help help -Visit: www.acdemocracy.org

(There is a video in this.)

Jihad Watch: The Libel Tourist

[Snowden]

What is going on among the unindicted co-conspirators? CAIR's Board Chairman quits


First the estimable Ahmed Bedier jumped ship. And there are rumors that others have been deep-sixed also, but I haven't been able to get confirmation. And now this. What on earth does Parvez Ahmed mean, that CAIR hasn't been proactive or open and transparent enough? What would Muqtedar Khan have preferred that CAIR do rather than whine about anti-terror efforts?

We may soon see the development of a new Muslim advocacy group, with a more sophisticated, less clumsy, less ham-handed approach than CAIR has taken to the stealth jihad.

"Chairman of Council on American-Islamic Relations resigns," by Jeff Brumley in The Jacksonville Times-Union, July 8 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Jacksonville resident Parvez Ahmed has resigned as chairman of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, saying he's frustrated about the national organization's failure to be more proactive and positive in its promotion of Muslim civil rights.

The nation's most well-known Muslim advocacy group, which he has led as board chairman since 2005, also needs to be more inclusive of younger, less-religious Muslims and encourage regular turnover of leadership ranks to ensure an infusion of new ideas, he told the Times-Union on Monday, a day after resigning.

These and other goals have been agreed to in principle by the organization's board and professional leadership, Ahmed said, but "an old guard mentality" among some of those leaders has kept elements of the strategic plan from being realized.

"And I got a little bit burned out pushing so hard" for the organization to be more open and transparent, he said.

The Washington, D.C.-based council declined to answer specific questions about Ahmed's comments. Instead, it e-mailed a four-sentence statement thanking Ahmed, 44, for his contributions and acknowledging differences in vision.

"Ultimately, the majority of organizational stakeholders supported a vision for implementing change and growth that differed from that of Dr. Ahmed," the statement said.

Two board members did not return phone calls seeking comment Monday.

An outspoken critic of the group said Ahmed did not capitalize on a golden opportunity to transform the organization.

The council was the only Muslim agency in the United States experiencing growth when Ahmed assumed its leadership, said Muqtedar Khan, director of Islamic Studies at the University of Delaware. But its continued foray into political and foreign-policy matters - such as seeking rights for foreign combatants held at Guantanamo Bay - has detracted from its mission of promoting Muslim-American rights, he said.

"He had an opportunity to take it to the next level and I think he failed," Khan said....

Jihad Watch: What is going on among the unindicted co-conspirators? CAIR's Board Chairman quits