10,000 more troops needed in Iraq!

[Ironside]

A year ago, President Bush announced the "end of major combat." Since then, hundreds upon hundreds of young American soldiers have been killed in Iraq.

Last month was our deadliest month to date, in Iraq.

President Bush told the enemy to "Bring 'em on"!

Now this...

10,000 more troops requested



Meanwhile, Gen. John Abizaid, head of the U.S. Central Command, said Monday he has asked the Pentagon for the equivalent of at least two combat brigades, roughly 10,000 troops, to handle the insurgents in Iraq.

"What I've asked for is essentially to have a strong mobile combat arms capability," Abizaid said at a news conference in Baghdad. "That's probably about two brigades worth of combat power, if not more."

Pentagon sources said that for three months that need will be filled by elements of the 1st Armored Division that had been scheduled to return home.

At least two U.S. Marines were killed and eight others wounded Monday evening in an intense exchange with insurgents in Fallujah, according to pool reporters embedded with the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force.

A building housing the Marines was first hit by mortar and/or rocket fire, and then by small arms fire in a firefight lasting about an hour .

Fallujah has been the scene of bitter fighting between U.S. forces and Iraqi militants, following the killings and mutilations of four American contractors in the city earlier this month.

The insurgent uprising from Najaf to Tikrit is making this month the deadliest one since the war in Iraq began in March 2003. With April not yet half over, at least 75 U.S. troops have been killed in hostile action; 26 of them died in fighting over the weekend.

MORE on this Story HERE!

The end of major combat isn't over and saying it is, is an insult to all those serving in Iraq.

[AngelWithHorns]

Wasn't it said that when this came up that the 10,000 troops would only be temporary? If it is only temporary, I think it's a big mistake. Just like when we downsized our troops back in the 90's. We need more troops period, not just for this but for the simple sake that we are finding out just how hard it is to do a job that requires more troops in the first place. Whether it be in Iraq or anywhere else.

[Ironside]

I think we should send 30,000, maybe more.
Either withdraw or or go all the way!

[AngelWithHorns]

I think we are too far into this to withdraw now. We need to increase our number of troops for the sake of our brothers and sisters in combat. Sure they can stay over there for years, but they need to have back up and they need to have someone there for them when they have to do rotations and movements. They do need to come home for leave as well and someone has to take their place during that time. We are stretched way too thin right now that it's scary.

[sfga6970]

I thought that this article would would add to this post. Apparently our troops are comitted and are staying the course.


Virginian-Pilot
April 14, 2004


Despite a rising tide of combat deaths and the prospect of deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan for years to come, Americans continue to volunteer for duty and are re-enlisting at record rates.

The services believe a combination of patriotism and the economy is driving people to the military and keeping them there.

"The war is not only not having a negative effect, but it is helping to reinforce the number of people who want to join," said Cmdr. John Kirby, a spokesman for the Navy's Bureau of Personnel.

Even the Army National Guard, which has had 150,000 citizen soldiers mobilized for up to a year, has seen retention rates "going through the roof," said Guard spokesman Maj. Robert Howell.

"Mass exodus has not been the case in the Army National Guard," said Howell, deputy chief of the Strength Maintenance Division at the National Guard Bureau in Washington.

The Guard was prepared to lose up to 18 percent of units returning from lengthy deployments, but it has averaged just 16.6 percent, with some as low as 12.6 percent, Howell said.

The Guard fully expects to again reach its recruiting goal of 56,000 members this year, to maintain its total strength of 350,000.

The Guard's goal for first-term re-enlistments , for those with less than six years of service, had been 65 percent this fiscal year but has rocketed to 141 percent - which indicates that additional members re-enlisted early, usually to take advantage of bonuses.

The goal for second- and third-term enlistments, or those considered "career" soldiers, was set at 85 percent in the Guard but has come in at 136 percent, Howell said.

The Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and Coast Guard all met or exceeded their year-end recruiting goals for fiscal year 2003, which ended Sept. 30. The figures continued to climb in the first half of fiscal year 2004, which was reached March 31.

The Army is at 100.1 percent of its "active duty mission," said spokesman Douglas Smith, reviewing numbers current as of March 29. Smith said 34,593 soldiers had been enlisted for the active Army and 8,331 for the Reserves. The Army has been ahead of its goal every year since 2000 and every month this year, Smith said.

The Navy is meeting all recruiting and retention goals and has cut the number of new recruits this year to the lowest target in 30 years.

Instead of bringing 41,200 new recruits into the service this fiscal year, the Navy will cut it off at 40,450, said Lt. Bill Davis with the Navy Personnel Command in Millington, Tenn.

"Thus far, through March, we've recruited 15,636, but this is normally our slow period," Davis said. "Things kick up in the summer with high school graduates. Where we've been getting 2,000 a month, we'll jump to 4,000 a month in the summer."

Navy re-enlistment rates are at an all time high, with 62.3 percent of first-term sailors signing up for additional service. That compares with a targeted goal of 56 percent. The rate has grown each year since 2000, when 48.2 percent of the first-term sailors re-enlisted.

For those with six to 10 years of service, the Navy re-enlisted 74.1 percent; its goal had been 70 percent. For those with 10 to 14 years of service, 88.7 percent re-enlisted so far this year; the goal was 85 percent.

The last time the Navy missed its recruiting goal was in 1998, Davis said.

In the Air Force, new recruit contracts are coming in at 104.2 percent of goal in fiscal year 2003 and reached 102.6 percent of goal through March.

The Air Force is retaining 67 percent of its first-term enlisted members, 75 percent of its second term, and 98 percent of its career enlisted .

Like the Army, the Marine Corps has been in the thick of combat in Iraq, yet the Marines have exceeded their monthly recruiting goal every month for the past 106 consecutive months, or for nearly nine consecutive years.

From October to December 2003 - the first quarter of fiscal year 2004 - the Marines recruited 9,201 potential members, surpassing their goal of 8,729.

Even the Coast Guard, which has grown by more than 10 percent to 40,000 since the terrorists attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, is keeping its members .

The Coast Guard has lost 7 percent to 8 percent of its force through attrition each year. In 2001 the rate was 7.65 percent; in 2002 it was 7.9 percent, said Chief Petty Officer Paul Rhynarb, at Coast Guard Headquarters in Washington.

But in 2003 the rate fell to just 2.68 percent, Rhynarb said.

Chief Petty Officer John Hoesli, who heads the Coast Guard's recruiting station in Chesapeake, responsible for recruiting from Williamsburg to Cape Hatteras, has never seen recruiting so good. His office has been the most productive in the past four years and was named the best throughout the Coast Guard in 2001.

"Whether it's patriotism, or defending the nation by keeping the fight here and keeping terrorism out of here that draws people, I don't know," Hoesli said. He suspects those are some of the reasons, along with an economy that is sending more people into the service .

While the Coast Guard aims its sights mainly at the 18- to 20- year-old recruit, Hoesli said he is seeing older, more experienced candidates in their mid- to late-20s, many with college degrees.

[cb88]

Good post, sfga. At my ex husband's guard unit, they actually had to force some people out. There are a lot staying.

[Hoss68]

No. 319-04
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Apr 14, 2004
Media Contact: (703)697-5131
Public/Industry Contact: (703)428-0711

National Guard and Reserve Mobilized as of April 14, 2004


This week all the services reported a decrease with the exception of the Coast Guard who remain unchanged in support of the partial mobilization. The net collective result is 1,728 less reservists on active duty than last week.

At any given time, services may mobilize some units and individuals while demobilizing others, making it possible for these figures to either increase or decrease. Total number currently on active duty in support of the partial mobilization for the Army National Guard and Army Reserve is 150,289; Naval Reserve 2,654; Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve, 13,035; Marine Corps Reserve, 5,086; and the Coast Guard Reserve, 1,586. This brings the total National Guard and Reserve on active duty to 172,650 including both units and individual augmentees.