Why I own an assault weapon...

[cato2]

From another site.

Why I own an assault weapon...

Every now and again someone asks me why I own a so-called assault weapon.

My reply: Because I can. I'm a freeman, haven't hurt anyone. I enjoy the look, feel and bang of my AR-15.

That reply never suffices. I can tell by the look on their faces that they want more justification, fiber to my reply.

I then tell them that I like books as well, and that I'm against banning books. Thoughts, I tell them, can be quite dangerous in the wrong brains. Nevertheless, I state that anyone who supports banning books (thoughts) must have a different view of the first amendment than me.

That still doesn't quench his or her first why someone would want a gun that is so seemingly menacing and deadly.

I then ask them to tell me what an assault weapon is. I do this to gauge their level of knowledge regarding these guns. They typically cannot put a sentence together that accurately describes these guns. Quite often, these individuals use the words "machine gun" when describing assault weapons.

I then ask them if they know that their local Wal Mart sells more deadly and accurate guns than the guns President Clinton banned. That shocks them. Many do not believe me. I then offer to take them to Wal Mart and give them a basic lesson in firearms. None have ever taken me up on my offer.

I also ask them if they know the difference between a machine gun and a semi-automatic gun. Most do not. I explain the difference and that so-called assault weapons are semi-automatic. Some actually get angry with me because of their fundamental lack of firearm knowledge. I let them get angry. I have learned that some people experience great pain when exposed to facts and common sense.

I then tell them tongue in cheek that there are any number of things that we could ban that would make America much safer than banning so-called assault weapons, which, I tell them are rarely used in crime. I invite them to call their local police department and ask how many crimes were committed with so-called assault weapons over the past year. I doubt they ever make that call. Ignorance is comfortable and easy.

Let's start with cars. Why should America make any car that will travel over 75 mph? I tell them there have been any number of studies that indicate faster speeds equate to more accidents, injuries and death.

Throw booze in on top of fast cars and now you've really got a deadly combination. I ask them if they know how many people are mangled, injured and killed because of cars and booze. They never know this, so I tell them. I then ask them if they support banning fast cars and booze.

I also tell them that cigarettes and fattening food are the number one killers in America. Knowing that, I ask them if they believe we should regulate or out-right ban McDonalds, Burger King, etc. They typically stammer around and mumble something along the lines of ".of course not. That's a personal choice."

"Exactly," I reply. "Welcome to America."

Because of the nature of this forum, the membership here could have answered those questions, then again perhaps not. One of the problems is the amount of mis-information that is out there in the public domain concerning issues. Many are simply driven by emotionally based belief's rather then fact.

[Caldric]

I think the first part banning books was the best analogy. Makes people think a little deeper.

[Woodmonkey]

Originally Posted by Caldric

I think the first part banning books was the best analogy. I think makes people think a little deeper.

I agee, Caldric. This is a good thread. I hope that Carnage sees it cause it is right up his alley!

[cb88]

Dang, Cato! I thought you were going to be making some deep dark confession about gunning down jehovah's wittnesses in this thread or something!!!!!


Seriously...great points made by the author. Unfortunately, reason and logic are often lost on those who would restrict our rights.

[JohnRN]

Ok, I think those analogies are bad - books and cars. The primary purpose of a gun is to kill, wound or maim. Wheather used in offense or denfence - that is still the purpose of a gun.

Not a car or a book.

However, what I liked best is:

"I'm a freeman, haven't hurt anyone. I enjoy the look, feel and bang of my AR-15."

"Thoughts, I tell them, can be quite dangerous in the wrong brains."

And last but not least, "Guns don't kill people. People Kill People."

You ban guns and if I want to kill someone, I'll just find something else. Hell, with the Kalaripayuttu (ancient Indian martial art), I can kill or paralyse people just by jabbing certain points of the body with my fingers. Or just use my Mother's kitchen knife.

[cato2]

Originally Posted by cb88

Dang, Cato! I thought you were going to be making some deep dark confession about gunning down jehovah's wittnesses in this thread or something!!!!!

Shhhhh......

I bet they have some stories about just that!!!

Originally Posted by John

Ok, I think those analogies are bad - books and cars. The primary purpose of a gun is to kill, wound or maim. Wheather used in offense or denfence - that is still the purpose of a gun.

You are correct in part here, but do not forget, they are also there to prevent as well.

You ban guns and if I want to kill someone, I'll just find something else. Hell, with the Kalaripayuttu (ancient Indian martial art), I can kill or paralyse people just by jabbing certain points of the body with my fingers. Or just use my Mother's kitchen knife.

Man has certainly shown his ability to find ways of killing. Refinement of for that purpose has led to the evolution of weapons. It never has replaced the older methods, just added to the potential of achievement.

[cb88]

Good point, John.


I don't seem to remember even ONE gun being used to kill over 3000 people on 9/11/01.