Prince Harry and the Nazi Uniform....

Woodmonkey · 01-13-2005, 20:14

What with this 20 year old? Is he that insensitive? Or just that stupid? I'm sure glad that we aren't saddled with having to support royalty in this country.

Quote:

Prince Harry's Costume Causes Widespread Scandal

Quote:

LONDON, Jan. 13 -- Now surely we've all faced this problem: we've been invited to a fancy dress party at someone's country estate and nothing in the closet is quite right. What to wear? For Prince Harry, third in line to the British throne, here's the answer that came to mind: dress up as a German soldier, complete with army uniform and Nazi armband.

Unfortunately for Harry, a red-headed 20-year-old with an ever-expanding reputation for bad judgment, someone at the party Saturday night took his photograph and sold it to the Sun, Britain's most carnivorous tabloid. The result was splashed across its front page Thursday morning: "Harry the Nazi," screamed the headline, superimposed upon a photo of Prince Charles's and the late Princess Diana's second son, sporting a ciggy, a drink and a swastika.

The spin machine at Clarence House, Charles's official residence, shifted into high gear, immediately issuing a brief statement of contrition in Harry's name -- "I am very sorry if I have caused any offense or embarrassment to anyone. It was a poor choice of costume and I apologize" -- and spending the rest of the day anonymously briefing the British press about a) how very, very stupid Harry had been and b) how very, very crushed he felt.

Still, the apology wasn't enough to head off a storm of criticism. Politicians weighed in, starting with the leaders of two of Britain's main political parties, who called on Harry to appear personally and apologize more fully. A former Armed Forces minister, Doug Henderson, went further and demanded that Harry resign from Sandhurst, the elite military academy where he is scheduled to begin an officer training course later this year.

"After the revelations, I don't think this young man is suitable for Sandhurst," Henderson told reporters. "If it was anyone else, the application wouldn't be considered." What do you want to bet that he will get a pass?

Members of the Jewish community were stunned. Greville Janner, a member of the House of Lords and former president of the Jewish Board of Deputies, called Harry's behavior "stupid, thoughtless, tactless." The headline on a hastily penned editorial for Friday's weekly Jewish Chronicle reads: "Mind Boggling."

"People are genuinely surprised and offended," said the Chronicle's editor, Ned Temko. "The instinct always among the leadership of the Jewish community is 'Don't make a federal case out of it.' Some people will excuse him by saying he's just 20, but he is, after all, part of an institution seen as embodying what it is to be British." His country suffered greatly at the hands of the Nazis and his grandmother risked her life to stay with her people. If he doesn't know this is wrong, and offensive, by the time he is 20, there is something seriously wrong. This is one who is 3rd in line for the throne.

Harry's timing was impeccably bad, coming exactly two weeks before Europe solemnly commemorates the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz death camp in Poland by Soviet troops. Harry's grandmother, Queen Elizabeth, has invited Holocaust survivors and British war veterans who helped liberate them to a reception at St. James's Palace, and she will attend a Holocaust Memorial Day commemoration at Westminster Hall. Harry's uncle, Prince Edward, will represent the queen at a memorial service at Auschwitz.

Temko said Harry's statement of contrition was sorely lacking. "It implied this was a wardrobe problem," he said. "Whatever further statement he makes, there has to be some reflection that a swastika armband isn't just a fashion item, that it symbolizes a lot more. One of the most dismaying aspects for Jews and non-Jews is that there seems to be an utter lack of awareness of the context of the Holocaust and the war."

This is hardly the first time that Harry has drawn public attention for boorish or outrageous behavior. Three years ago his father dispatched him to observe a drug rehabilitation center after he was caught smoking marijuana. There have been number of instances of public intoxication, and last October he scuffled with a paparazzi photographer outside a London nightclub. But two weeks ago he and his older brother William spent a day at a warehouse helping ship relief supplies to tsunami victims in southern Asia, bolstering the image their late mother had painstakingly cultivated as a caring royal. Those are just photo ops. I wonder how much work they actually did.

Saturday's fancy dress party was thrown by Olympic show jumper Richard Meade for his son Harry's 22nd birthday. The theme was "Native and Colonial," and Prince William reportedly showed up wearing a lion and leopard outfit that he made himself, complete with black leggings.

William is two years older than his brother and supposedly better equipped in the brains and judgment department. But it apparently did not occur to him to tell his brother to lose the Nazi regalia. Or if he did, Harry paid no heed.

Harry came to the party wearing an army jacket with a German flag on the arm, the Sun reported. When he took it off, the khaki shirt underneath included a Wehrmacht badge on the collar and the swastika armband. An anonymous party-goer told the Sun that people were shocked by the outfit. "What on earth was Harry thinking?" one asked.

Some commentators were quick to blame Prince Charles, still seen by some royal watchers as the villain in the Charles-and-Di saga, which ended in a bitter divorce.

"I'm sorry, the Prince of Wales, he's a humanitarian and he does some terrific work, but I don't think he has . . . the right discipline over his children, particularly Prince Harry," Dickie Arbiter, a former Buckingham Palace press officer, told Sky News.

But others pleaded for time and patience. They say Harry is a sensitive young man, scarred by his glamorous mother's death in a 1997 car crash, who is deeply sensitive to criticism and needs space to mature. He's 20 years old. Lots of kids have lost a parent and don't do this type of thing. Is that really an excuse?

"Give him a break," said royal biographer Robert Lacey. "We all make mistakes when we're young -- the difference is our mistakes aren't photographed and sold to the Sun."

Lacey says it would be a mistake for Harry to appear publicly for now or to attend one of the Holocaust memorial events. "He should lie low for a while. The sooner he gets to Sandhurst the better."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2005Jan13.html

Hoss68 · 01-13-2005, 20:39

It's an excuse Katie, NOT a reason.

I heard about this on the radio this morning. My first thought was WTF did he get somethinng as garish as that anyways?

William is more like his Mom, Harry is more like his Dad. Enough said...

conlor · 01-13-2005, 20:41

Doesn't he have 24-hour guards, like our Secret Service? How could they let him go ahead with this.

Woodmonkey · 01-13-2005, 21:14

Looks like the "little prince" feels that all he has to do is say he's sorry.

Connie, I watched a former palace worker say that there are people all around. There are even people to squeeze the toothpaste. Also, he went with his older brother and he didn't even say anything. Must not have seen anything wrong with that 'costume' either.

Quote:

Harry rules out Auschwitz visit

Quote:

<snip>

A royal official said he understood the calls for the prince to go to Auschwitz but there were no plans for him to attend any of the ceremonies.

"It would be a distraction and a detraction from the importance of the occasion because it would become a different story in media terms," the official told Reuters.

"He recognises he made a very bad mistake and he apologises for that. There are no plans for him to say anything more."

The Nazis murdered six million Jews and millions of others including Christians, Poles, homosexuals, Soviet prisoners and Gypsies. Millions more were imprisoned or forced to work as slaves.

Photographs of the younger son of the late Princess Diana and Prince Charles in Nazi attire appeared in the Sun, in Israeli papers and on websites around the world.

Harry, third in line to the throne, said in a statement he was sorry if he had caused any offence. "It was a poor choice of costume and I apologise," he said.

"INTOLERABLE"

Prime Minister Tony Blair said: "Prince Harry has made it clear he is very sorry about it and I think the rest of it is best to leave to Buckingham Palace."

Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom was less sympathetic, saying the use of Nazi symbols was intolerable.

"I think anybody who tries to pass it off as bad taste must be made aware that this can encourage others to think that perhaps that period was not as bad as we teach the young generation in the free world," he told reporters.

Conservative leader Michael Howard, who is Jewish, told BBC Radio: "It would be appropriate if we heard from him in person about how contrite he is."

Royal commentator Robert Lacey said he was just "a messed up kid" and should be left alone. "He clearly got it wrong. It is a very fine line and Harry stepped over it. But he has apologised and we have to move on," he told Reuters.

<snip>

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle...storyID=653772

scott.voigt · 01-14-2005, 00:19

LONDON - Britain’s Prince Charles has ordered his son Harry to visit Auschwitz after he caused outrage around the world by wearing a Nazi uniform to a party, the Sun newspaper reported on Friday.

The paper said heir-to-the-throne Charles was “incandescent with rage” with the 20-year-old grandson of Queen Elizabeth and wants him to make a private trip to the concentration camp to learn more about the Holocaust.

Jewish groups had demanded Harry go the camp in southwest Poland to make amends for wearing a swastika armband and an army shirt with Nazi regalia at a costume party on Saturday.

The Sun, which broke the Nazi gaffe story on Thursday, quoted an unnamed royal source as saying that Prince Charles also told his older son, William, to travel with Harry to Auschwitz.

Woodmonkey · 01-14-2005, 00:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott.voigt

The paper said heir-to-the-throne Charles was “incandescent with rage” with the 20-year-old grandson of Queen Elizabeth and wants him to make a private trip to the concentration camp to learn more about the Holocaust.

I bet that he was because it sure make the royals look bad.

Quote:

The Sun, which broke the Nazi gaffe story on Thursday, quoted an unnamed royal source as saying that Prince Charles also told his older son, William, to travel with Harry to Auschwitz.

He is the father. He should go with him himself and make sure that lessons are learned.