Go Back   Trackpads Community > General Discussions > News Articles

News Articles Discussions about articles pulled from websites that include news, sports, entertainment, politics etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-12-2006, 10:32   #1 (permalink)
Non-Commissioned Officer
 
mgstrow's Avatar
My Awards Rack
Bronze Reputation  Medal Gold Vehicle ID Medal Army Service Button Bronze Threads Medal 
Total Awards: 4
My Mood
Status
mgstrow is offline
Post Count
126
My Photos
My Photos: 0
Member Flags
United States Undisclosed
My Referrals
My Referrals: 0
Personal Guestbook
Reputation +/-
mgstrow has a spectacular aura aboutmgstrow has a spectacular aura aboutmgstrow has a spectacular aura aboutmgstrow has a spectacular aura aboutmgstrow has a spectacular aura aboutmgstrow has a spectacular aura aboutmgstrow has a spectacular aura aboutmgstrow has a spectacular aura aboutmgstrow has a spectacular aura about
Other Swag
T-Bucks: 2,848.00
Bank: 0.00
Total T-Bucks: 2,848.00

 
Post Army Continues Improving Body Armor

American Forces Press Service | By Jim Garamone | January 11, 2006
WASHINGTON – The Army will continue to improve body armor issued to soldiers, and will begin manufacturing side-panel inserts to the Interceptor ballistic armor, officials said.
The side panels, which weigh 3 pounds, will be made of the same material as the small-arms protective inserts.
Army Col. Thomas Spoehr is in charge of fielding body armor. He said the Interceptor body armor now issued to servicemembers protects against most of the threats they face in Iraq and Afghanistan today.
"It's the best body armor in the world," Spoehr said.
And the proof is in the number of people who are alive today because of the armor. One documented account from June 2003 showed an Iraqi shooting a soldier at point-blank range in the chest with a shotgun. The young soldier picked himself off the ground and arrested the Iraqi.
The Army is making changes to the protection system, Spoehr said, but has to be careful to balance changes with mission. "You could outfit a soldier from head to toe in armor, and he would be completely useless," he said. "We have to be sensitive to the weight burden we put on soldiers in that arduous environment over there. Every ounce that we put on the back of a soldier could mean the difference between their ability to accomplish the mission or not."
Weight is a huge factor, officials said. The average infantryman carries 85 pounds of gear into battle, according to officials at the Infantry School at Fort Benning, Ga. This includes weapons, ammunition, water, protective gear and so on. The Interceptor armor - the vest and SAPI plates, along with neck and groin protection - weigh in at about 16 pounds.
But the improvements planned for the Interceptor armor will increase the weight. Enhanced SAPI plates will add 3 pounds to the weight, and side-panel plates another 3 pounds. Other shoulder and side protection adds 5 pounds. Wearing all pieces of the Interceptor armor could add about 27 pounds to soldiers' burden.
By comparison, the "flak vest" of Vietnam came in at about 25 pounds, and the original flak vest worn by airmen during World War II weighed around 40 pounds, Air Force Museum officials said.
But in addition to weight, commanders have to look at constriction and how much ability soldiers have to move their arms and legs and get in and out of vehicles quickly, Spoehr said. "It's not as simple as going to a catalog and ordering it," he said.
He said the commander has to control this factor. The body armor is modular, and commanders can assess the threat and how much armor soldiers should wear.
"We're going to be producing a new side-armor plate," Spoehr said. "If the mission doesn't accommodate wearing that new side armor plate, then the commander can direct, 'Don't wear that today.'"
For example, while the side armor adds 3 pounds, it does provide more protection. "We want to give that type of an option to commanders," Spoehr said.
Army officials said they continue to monitor all aspects of fielding the armor. A check of the books revealed that 8,000 of the vests did not go through inspection, Spoehr said. The Army recalled those vests on Nov. 12, 2005, and would not issue them. No piece of armor will be issued to soldiers without undergoing a painstaking inspection process, he emphasized.

Last edited by mgstrow; 01-12-2006 at 10:39..
mgstrow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Trackpads Information
Click to Visit
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U.S. Army Bans Use of Privately Purchased Body Armor by Troops Hannibal Army 1 03-31-2006 21:42
Army Signs Emergency Body Armor Contract mgstrow Army 2 01-27-2006 14:43
Army Secretary Endorses New Body Armor mgstrow Army 0 01-19-2006 16:10
Better Body Armor Meets Changing Threat, Army Official Says Hannibal Army 1 01-19-2006 15:16
Army scientists, engineers develop liquid body armor BrianOKeeffe Weapons 2 09-10-2004 23:01


Community Information
Options
Quick Options
Trackpads Non-Commercial Ad
Copyright Information Click to Visit
Time
Server Time
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36.
Copyright
Copyright Information
The header is based off of work by Vipixel.com and modified by this site. Trackpads and the Trackpads Logo are both Registered Trademarks of Jason Edwards and cannot be used without prior written permission.  The only exception is as a link back to this site. Trackpads is a private website run by a small legion of volunteers, 3 dogs, 12.5 cats and an army of small, super smart, bio-engineered mice with pointy hats and tutu's. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
Archive Links
Archive Links
Page generated in 0.64134 seconds with 20 queries