![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | All Albums | Projects | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| News Articles Discussions about articles pulled from websites that include news, sports, entertainment, politics etc. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) | |||
| Monkey Mouse ![]() | This is a breaking story on Fox News. Apparently some nursing home staff abandoned their patients. Judge Nepolitano was interviewed and stated that staff cannot leave their patients to save their own lives when that means the patients will die. (This is different from a story a Brit newspaper is reporting and using anonymous sources that say some patients were euthanized during the aftermath of Katrina). What do you think about this? Should staff be required to stay even it it means they might die? Should this be a legal issue? Quote:
Click here for the source of this article
__________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How May I Help You? ![]() PM me through this link if clicking on those banners doesn't help with your questions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |||
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Monkey Mouse ![]() | The other patients were evacuated but could move on their own. These 34 elderly could not and drowned when the waters rose.
__________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How May I Help You? ![]() PM me through this link if clicking on those banners doesn't help with your questions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Junior Officer ![]() | [The owners of a nursing home where 34 patients died.] For me that is the defining point. Over and above any emergency plan a state may have the "for pay" facility has the responsibilty to act. To where, or how to get them there. Both questions that should have been spelled out as part of granting a license to operate the home. If that wasn't part of the licensing process why wasn't it? It still goes back to the facility operators though. They are the 1st. line of the decision making process. They had time to act well ahead of time. I suspect the decision to stay was based on economics. They would have to foot the bill to save the lives of the people they were being paid to care for. This too might be another notch in the discovery of how graft & corruption were rampant in Louisana. Now to the question. Yes I think this is a legal matter and the operators should be charged with murder by indifferance to human life. Negligent homicide may be the more severe charge. Whichever is the most severe should be how the justice system deals with killing innocents. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |||
| Monkey Mouse ![]() | They just posted a complete story. Quote:
Click here for the source of this article
__________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How May I Help You? ![]() PM me through this link if clicking on those banners doesn't help with your questions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |||
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Icing Queen ![]() | If there was a way to move the patients to safety and time to do it, then every effort should be made to move them. However, if the waters were rising and the owners knew they couldn't get them out, euthanizing them was actually a humane thing to do, rather than have them die from drowning. If they spent time to euthanize them, they could have been putting themselves in danger of drowning too. Of course, I wasn't there and I don't know the full story, but it's possible the owners did everything they could for their patients.
__________________ Your memory is our keepsake, With which we'll never part. God has you in his keeping, We have you in our hearts. ~2004 winner of The Outreach Award ~2005 co-winner of The Bronze Button Award ~March 2006 Perv of the Month ~Sept 2006, Oct 2007 - MOTM ~2007 Oct-Dec MOTQ ~2007 Female Silver Raincoat Recipient ~2007 MOTY |
| | |