Go Back   Trackpads Community > Military Discussions > Navy

Navy For any current or former sailors of any Armed Forces.

Navy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-28-2006, 18:42   #1 (permalink)
cec
Jr. Officer
 
cec's Avatar
My Awards Rack
Bronze Reputation  Medal Silver Vehicle ID Medal Bronze Gallery Medal Silver Commanders Coin Army Service Button Bronze Community Medal 1 Blue Star Silver Threads Medal 
Total Awards: 9
My Mood
My Mood:
Status
cec is offline
Post Count
3,279
My Photos
My Photos: 1
Staff Title
Services Forum Moderator
Member Flags
United States us south carolina
My Referrals
My Referrals: 2
Personal Guestbook
Reputation +/-
cec has a reputation beyond reputecec has a reputation beyond reputecec has a reputation beyond reputecec has a reputation beyond reputecec has a reputation beyond reputecec has a reputation beyond reputecec has a reputation beyond reputecec has a reputation beyond reputecec has a reputation beyond reputecec has a reputation beyond reputecec has a reputation beyond repute
Petz
Other Swag
T-Bucks: 76,333.67
Bank: 0.00
Total T-Bucks: 76,333.67
  

 
Navy Senate threatens LCS plans

July 28, 2006

Senate threatens LCS plans

By Christopher P. Cavas
Staff writer

Acquisition plans for the Navy’s Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program could fall one year and two ships behind if the Senate Appropriations Committee’s recommendations are passed by the full Congress.
The committee recommended halving the Navy’s request for two LCS ships in 2007, citing Congressional Research Service (CRS) estimates that the actual cost to buy each ship will be higher than the service’s $220 million estimate.
The committee also wants to take back one of three LCS ships approved last year.
The two ships requested in the 2007 Pentagon budget represent the fifth and sixth units of the LCS type. The first ship was approved in 2005; three were added in 2006.
The Navy plans to build a total of 55 ships under the LCS program, which aims to produce small and relatively inexpensive warships with modular weapon systems.
The service requested $520.7 million for two ships in 2007 at $260 million apiece, according to the committee report that accompanied the defense appropriations bill when it was sent to the full Senate on July 20.
But CRS’s Ron O’Rourke says that Navy budget data supplied along with the 2007 request shows that each ship will actually cost about $300 million.
Navy officials have said that the increase is a result of program management costs, allowances for changes, inflation and initial operating costs.
As a result of the price increase, the Senate Appropriations Committee said in its report, “the Navy is unable to procure both the third and fourth LCS ships without the availability of additional funding. The Committee is troubled by this revelation and recommends rescinding the insufficient fiscal year 2006 funds currently allocated to the fourth LCS vessel.
“Cost growth and design changes are jeopardizing the affordability appeal of LCS,” the committee report said.
In June, the House approved the Navy’s request for two LCS ships in its version of the 2007 defense appropriations bill and added $12.6 million for research and development.
DDG-1000 At Issue The future of DDG-1000/DD(X), the Navy’s controversial $3.3 billion-per-ship destroyer program, also is at issue between House and Senate appropriators. The Navy is asking for partial funding to begin construction of the first two ships in 2007, with the remainder of the cost to be requested in 2008. But the House provides full funding for only one destroyer rather than the partial funding plan for two ships. The Senate Appropriations Committee approved the Navy request.
Full action on the defense appropriations bill might be delayed until September if the Senate doesn’t vote before beginning its August recess on July 29. Differences in the House and Senate versions then will be hammered out by negotiators.




http://www.navytimes.com/print.php?f...25-1985164.php
__________________


~ Nov. 2007 MOTM
~2007 O My Award
cec is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Trackpads Information
Click to Visit
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Senate plans vote against troop surge Snowden Point/Counterpoint 1 01-19-2007 03:31
[News Feed] Missouri State Auditor Plans Senate Bid (AP) Forum Mouse News Articles 0 08-30-2005 22:00
[News Feed] US Senate OKs competing pesticide testing plans Forum Mouse News Articles 0 06-29-2005 22:00
Video in PPT threatens..cont'd =?Utf-8?B?Vi1nZXI=?= Microsoft Applications 3 01-07-2005 23:00
Video in PPT threatens life... =?Utf-8?B?Vi1nZXI=?= Microsoft Applications 1 01-07-2005 21:00


Community Information
Options
Quick Options
Trackpads Non-Commercial Ad
Copyright Information Click to Visit
Time
Server Time
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:21.
Copyright
Copyright Information
The header is based off of work by Vipixel.com and modified by this site. Trackpads and the Trackpads Logo are both Registered Trademarks of Jason Edwards and cannot be used without prior written permission.  The only exception is as a link back to this site. Trackpads is a private website run by a small legion of volunteers, 3 dogs, 12.5 cats and an army of small, super smart, bio-engineered mice with pointy hats and tutu's. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
Archive Links
Archive Links
Page generated in 0.79333 seconds with 21 queries