![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| MV List Archives of the MV Mailing List |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Civilians | See the response below... --- Bjorn Brandstedt <super_deuce@hotmail.com> wrote: [color=blue] > David always manages to find very informative > pictures for his articles > (MVM). I have a couple of question about two photos > in the Hydra-Matic > article (December 2004, page 34-35): > > 1) Is the rear suspension shown for the M135 > standard for the M135/M211 > trucks? Two springs, one auxiliary and one primary > (figure 6). Yes that is standard, another of the[/color] superior design features of the GMC. This allowed for greater carried loads over rougher terrain by controlling the axle movement. On the highway, 15,000 was no problem for these trucks. In a push, all four tires on a single rear axle could be removed and the truck still driven. Add this to having 2 separate rear drive shafts and you have a very field friendly truck.[color=blue] > > 2) Does anyone have any experience with the snow > chains shown on the truck > in figure 11? The cross links appear to be solid > pieces. They work great for the duals, have much[/color] better bite than conventional chains, but a dual set is a bear to install. We always ran chains on all wheels, some guys tried without chains on the front and that was a mess.....even with the superior front axle engagement system that the GMC had (NO they did NOT have sprag units like the M-35, or air lockers like the M-35 was upgraded to, the GMC unit did not give any trouble, IF it was adjusted to fully engage.) By the way, in addition to those extra springs, and with an engine that weighed less than half what the M-35 has, the GMC (211) still weighed over 1000 pounds more. Not fat just heavy built. Squirt_Truck(er) [color=blue] > > Thanks, > Bjorn > MVPA 19212 > Meadows of Dan, Virginia (light snow flurries and > windy today) > > > > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=== > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: > <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to > <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org> > To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org> > [/color] __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more. [url]http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com[/url] ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=== To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org> |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [MV] David Doyle's article on the Hydra-Matic | Tim Korade | MV List | 0 | 02-21-2005 02:50 |
| Re: [MV] David Doyle's article on the Hydra-Matic | Bjorn Brandstedt | MV List | 0 | 02-21-2005 02:50 |
| [MV] David Doyle's article on the Hydra-Matic | Bjorn Brandstedt | MV List | 0 | 02-21-2005 02:50 |
| [MV] Art's Air-O-Matic comments | Jim Cooney | MV List | 1 | 07-20-2004 14:01 |
| [MV] Art's Air-O-Matic comments | Adams-Graf, John | MV List | 10 | 06-18-2004 02:25 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |