![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| MV List Archives of the MV Mailing List |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Civilians | All of the early M series vehicles till I believe 1955 were produced with only on a single rear tail light and no turn signals. This was true of commercial trucks also. My M-211, a friends M-35 and another's M-211 that are in original conditi= on (read as not attacked by the civilian sector or zeroed by Uncle Sam) all only have single tail lights and no wiring I the harness for the second. Mark -----Original Message----- From: Military Vehicles Mailing List [mailto:mil-veh@mil-veh.org] On Beha= lf Of m35products Sent: 10 September, 2004 17:15 To: Military Vehicles Mailing List Subject: Re: [MV] Movement to ban private ownership of MVs gains momentum Does my M35 have stop, turn, and "break" lights? Of course it does. I wou= ld not be able to register it in NY State if it did not. I have added (manually-operated) back-up lights, and have all the gear ready to instal= l, to add a limit switch to the gear shift to make them operate automaticall= y. The state does not require them, but I added them for convenience and safety. I have also added clearance/markers, and conspicuity tape, to mak= e the truck DOT compliant. It was not necessary, as it is registered as an historical vehicle, but prudence dictates an occasional expense. Are you aware of any M-series truck that is not equipped with stop, turn = and brake lights? I am not. You claim that "deuces" do not. (CCKW's do not. M135/211/35 do.) I have never seen an M-series deuce, 5-ton, or ten-ton that did not. Please explain your concerns more explicitly. apb ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Paul Farber" <farber@f-tech.net> To: "m35products" <m35prod@optonline.net> Cc: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 4:07 PM Subject: Re: [MV] Movement to ban private ownership of MVs gains momentum [color=blue] > m35products wrote: >[color=green] > >David, old friend: > > > >I sometimes post off-topic messages, and sometimes respond to them. > > > >I always obey the licensing, insurance, traffic, and common sense rule=[/color][/color] s, and[color=blue][color=green] > >always complain about thems who don't. > > > >Is there a place for me in your Utopia? > > > >apb > > > > > >----- Original Message -----=20 > >From: <DDoyle9570@aol.com> > >To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org> > >Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 2:29 PM > >Subject: [MV] Movement to ban private ownership of MVs gains momentum > > > > > > > >[color=darkred] > >>Over the years through this list I have made many friends, and have > >> > >>[/color] > >learned many things about the private ownership of military vehicles. =[/color][/color] I[color=blue][color=green] > >hope to remain in private contact with these friends over the coming[/color][/color] years.[color=blue][color=green] > > > >[color=darkred] > >>However, it seems that private ownership of military vehicles in the =[/color][/color][/color] US is[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred] > >> > >>[/color] > >doomed. > > > >[color=darkred] > >>Many of these historic machines are larger and heavier than the avera=[/color][/color][/color] ge[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred] > >> > >>[/color] > >passenger car, and an abundance of caution must be used in their[/color][/color] operation[color=blue][color=green] > >to insure the safety of the general public. The public, and of course[/color][/color] their[color=blue][color=green] > >elected officials, well remember the devastation caused by an unlawful > >operation of a stolen M60 a few years ago, and only a few months ago t=[/color][/color] he[color=blue][color=green] > >tragic accident involving a pair of privately owned deuces garnered me=[/color][/color] dia[color=blue][color=green] > >attention. > > > >[color=darkred] > >>All of this points to the importance of the MV collector's community[/color][/color][/color] using[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred] > >> > >>[/color] > >great prudence and caution when operating our vehicles. > > > >[color=darkred] > >>The first step in safe operation of these vehicles is reading AND > >> > >>[/color] > >FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS on the dash placards, and in the comprehens=[/color][/color] ive[color=blue][color=green] > >operator's manuals. This is indeed what dooms the hobby. Based on th=[/color][/color] e[color=blue][color=green] > >recent postings on this list, there are many people in this hobby who =[/color][/color] are[color=blue][color=green] > >either too stupid to understand plain, simple brief instructions, or h=[/color][/color] ave a[color=blue][color=green] > >"this doesn't apply to me" attitude. This will surely lead to sensele=[/color][/color] ss[color=blue][color=green] > >accidents, and the tragic loss of life or injury, and in turn the bann=[/color][/color] ing of[color=blue][color=green] > >the "dangerous" vehicles from private ownership to protect the general > >citizenry. The rest of us in the hobby will loose because of the[/color][/color] stupidity[color=blue][color=green] > >or arrogance of the few. > > > >[color=darkred] > >>As evidence of this foretelling trend I point to the overwhelming num=[/color][/color][/color] ber[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred] > >> > >>[/color] > >of off-topic, political posts on this list. Who here is so stupid tha=[/color][/color] t they[color=blue][color=green] > >cannot understand the simple list rules, agreed to upon registering,[/color][/color] which[color=blue][color=green] > >include NO OFF TOPIC DISCUSSIONS? Or, are these posters so arrogant a=[/color][/color] s to[color=blue][color=green] > >think they are above these rules, or so arrogant as to think that the[/color][/color] rest[color=blue][color=green] > >of us give a rat's a-- about who they intend to vote for, or why? > > > >[color=darkred] > >>There is no other explanation, it must be stupidity, or arrogance. > >> > >>So, when the drive with the same "who give's a darn about the rules" > >> > >>[/color] > >attitude and whiz through a stop sign (That traffic rule doesn't apply=[/color][/color] to[color=blue][color=green] > >ME, I'm special, and post and drive as I please) and into a school bus=[/color][/color] , or[color=blue][color=green] > >park their tank on the lawn of the state capitol because they can (jus=[/color][/color] t like[color=blue][color=green] > >they CAN post whatever suits their fancy to the list), we will all suf=[/color][/color] fer[color=blue][color=green] > >for it. Just like we all suffer through their political rantings. > > > >[color=darkred] > >>Yes, I could hit delete, but why should I have to? Why should I (and > >> > >>[/color] > >countless others) have to suffer and work because an ignorant, arrogan=[/color][/color] t few[color=blue][color=green] > >believe themselves to be above the rules? > > > >[color=darkred] > >>Kiss your MVs goodbye boys, the dopes among us will undo our hobby. > >> > >>Regards, > >>David Doyle > >> > >>=3D=3D=3DMil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=3D=3D=3D > >>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org> > >>To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to[/color][/color][/color] <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred] > >>To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org> > >> > >>[/color] > > > > > >=3D=3D=3DMil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=3D=3D=3D > >To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org> > >To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.o=[/color][/color] rg>[color=blue][color=green] > >To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org> > > > > > > > >[/color] > Yeah but does your MV have the stop/turn/break/backup lights? If its a=[/color] n[color=blue] > ex military vehicle I would doubt it. Most MVs that are not specific > types do (CUCVs etc). But dueces, humvess, jeeps etc mostly do not. > > You make stop at all the signs... but if the person behind you doesn't > you're still at fault and are still gonna have your MV ownership[/color] questioned.[color=blue] > > A light kit for an MV is easy to add and cost a few bucks.[/color] =3D=3D=3DMil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=3D=3D=3D To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org> Outgoing mail is Virus Scanned byNorman Data Defense. Inbound Spa= m reduced 98.2% byVircom Sieve. =20 ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=== To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org> |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: [MV] Movement to ban private ownership of MVs gainsmomentum | noel shelley | MV List | 0 | 09-11-2004 16:00 |
| Re: [MV] Movement to ban private ownership of MVs gainsmomentum | Paul Farber | MV List | 0 | 09-11-2004 04:00 |
| Re: [MV] Movement to ban private ownership of MVs gainsmomentum | Joe Garrett | MV List | 0 | 09-10-2004 22:00 |
| Re: [MV] Movement to ban private ownership of MVs gainsmomentum | Joe Scheaffer | MV List | 0 | 09-10-2004 22:00 |
| Re: [MV] Movement to ban private ownership of MVs gainsmomentum | Stephen L Dussetschleger | MV List | 0 | 09-10-2004 22:00 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |