Evidence

If this game were doing ANYTHING at ALL.....

There would be a LOT more traffic on this news group don;t you think??

Skinner1@hotmail.com wrote:

> If this game were doing ANYTHING at ALL.....
>
> There would be a LOT more traffic on this news group don;t you think??
>
>

Even at the height of SWG, this newsgroup was slow. The Sony boards are
still hopping, though. That's where the traffic has always been.

CH

Reply to message from Clawhound <none@nowhere.com> (Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:41:
10) about "Re: Evidence":

Yeah, I have to agree with Clawhound here. Unfortunately this group was
never really busy. Sadly enough the people preferred to get banned for
voicing their opinion on the SWG-forums instead of using this one.



C> Skinner1@hotmail.com wrote:

>> If this game were doing ANYTHING at ALL.....

>> There would be a LOT more traffic on this news group don;t you think??



C> Even at the height of SWG, this newsgroup was slow. The Sony boards are
C> still hopping, though. That's where the traffic has always been.

C> CH



Bye
Dirk Pfeiffer <dirk@dbx501.de> Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:55:06 +0200

=== Posted with Qusnetsoft NewsReader 2.2.0.8

> Even at the height of SWG, this newsgroup was slow. The Sony boards are
> still hopping, though. That's where the traffic has always been.

Huh? Go to the Ahazi board. There is hardly anyone there . .and Ahazi
"was" one of the most populated servers. Even now, only about 1 in 5 posts
are actually about SWG and that is to complain.

Relativity wrote:

>>Even at the height of SWG, this newsgroup was slow. The Sony boards are
>>still hopping, though. That's where the traffic has always been.
>
>
> Huh? Go to the Ahazi board. There is hardly anyone there . .and Ahazi
> "was" one of the most populated servers. Even now, only about 1 in 5 posts
> are actually about SWG and that is to complain.
>
>

Expansions and Items And Quests still have lots of flow. Valcyn is slow,
but it's always been slower. Ahazi is busier than Valcyn.

In any even, any board that you pick will be busier than this board.
This board is proof of nothing.

CH

"Kas" <nykara@[NO-SPAM]optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:42b00f40$0$16492$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
> Dunno why everyone thinks a server merge would be a bad
> thing, i think its a good thing to keep a game going as long as possible
> invoking as much fun as possible for those still playing it.

I am sure SOE/LucasArts would love to merge servers because some of these
servers are virtual ghost towns. But it's gonna be difficult for them to do
so. Other games like Everquest don't have land property to worry about.
All the people who have built cities around prime real estate, by Coronet
etc. will get shafted bigtime.

I do agree however, eventually it's going to happen.

Soot wrote:

> "Kas" <nykara@[NO-SPAM]optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:42b00f40$0$16492$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
>
>>Dunno why everyone thinks a server merge would be a bad
>>thing, i think its a good thing to keep a game going as long as possible
>>invoking as much fun as possible for those still playing it.
>
>
> I am sure SOE/LucasArts would love to merge servers because some of these
> servers are virtual ghost towns. But it's gonna be difficult for them to do
> so. Other games like Everquest don't have land property to worry about.
> All the people who have built cities around prime real estate, by Coronet
> etc. will get shafted bigtime.
>
> I do agree however, eventually it's going to happen.
>
>

Not right now. I made a new character last night.

Two servers were VERY HEAVY.
About six servers were HEAVY.
Another six were MEDIUMS.
And eight were LIGHT.

The game is absolutely jumping with new folks. The game is actively
being played. The death of this game is greatly exhagerated.

CH