![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Chit-Chat Non-debate discussions - uncontroversial topics not covered in other forums , light-hearted, heartwarming, risque, weird news, fun things etc. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Monkey Mouse ![]() | The wedding's off -- see you in court! Instead of walking down the aisle of a church, a former New York couple will traipse down the aisle of a court room to settle a fight over a $48,800 diamond engagement ring. Dean Kuehnen Jr. is suing his ex-fiance, Andria Castellano, to compel her to either return the ring or give him cash -- as well as cover his legal fees and costs, according to the complaint filed in New York State Court. Castellano has threatened to sell or destroy the 3.23-carat ring, even though the couple agreed the ring would be returned to Kuehnen if their engagement was ever broken off, the complaint says. Both were 21 years old when they became engaged in December last year, but by September this year the wedding was off. "The sole and exclusive consideration, motivation and reason for buying the ring was the contemplated marriage," the complaint says. Attempts to contact Castellano were unsuccessful. According to the United States' Emily Post Institute that offers etiquette and manners advice, "if an engagement is broken, the bride should immediately return the ring to her former fiance." "The only "but" in this case is if the ring is a family heirloom of the bride's. She should then keep the ring," the institute said on its Web site. The Source
__________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How May I Help You? ![]() PM me through this link if clicking on those banners doesn't help with your questions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Non-Commissioned Officer ![]() | On the other hand, the engagement ring is rumored to have come about as a way of reimbursing the bride for a sullied reputation, should an engagement be called off. The idea was (in theory-- I don't know how true this is) that a woman's true value was in her virginity, and many women lost that during the engagement period. Therefore, if the wedding never happened, the ring would, in some way, pay her back for the nosedive her worth had taken on the general market. Its sale could potentially aid her in starting over. Therefore, the engagement ring is just exactly for that purpose-- for the bride to keep in the event of a, well, shall we say, non-event. Some states have laws written to that effect, I'm told. I wonder if Ms. Post was discussing an engagement ended by the fiance or the fiancee, or did she differentiate?
__________________ Alan Shore: Denny, I refuse to shoot you. Denny Crane: You... Democrat! Protesting war and banning guns. If you Nancys had your way, nobody would ever shoot anybody! And then where would we be?" ~Boston Legal~ Winner of the 2007 Trackpads Peeping Tom Award Click on the banner if you are up to the challenge! |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Monkey Mouse ![]() | According to Miss Manners, the ring is given in anticipation of a wedding and, if the wedding doesn't take place, then the man gets the ring back.
__________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How May I Help You? ![]() PM me through this link if clicking on those banners doesn't help with your questions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Icing Queen ![]() | I've always heard that if the bride breaks the engagement, she gives the ring back. If he breaks it, she keeps it. What I'm wondering is, where did a 21 year old get that kind of money for a ring?!?!?
__________________ Your memory is our keepsake, With which we'll never part. God has you in his keeping, We have you in our hearts. ~2004 winner of The Outreach Award ~2005 co-winner of The Bronze Button Award ~March 2006 Perv of the Month ~Sept 2006, Oct 2007 - MOTM ~2007 Oct-Dec MOTQ ~2007 Female Silver Raincoat Recipient ~2007 MOTY |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | ||
| Monkey Mouse ![]() | Quote:
Quote:
![]()
__________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How May I Help You? ![]() PM me through this link if clicking on those banners doesn't help with your questions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Bad kitty...bad kitty...shame! ![]() | Several states have specific laws regarding the ring... http://marriage.about.com/od/rings/a/ringreturn.htm Quote:
When a gentleman proposes, with a ring, what happens? He presents the ring and asks a woman to marry him. If she doesn't intend to marry him, she says no and gives the ring back. Therefore, the ring IS NOT a gift...its a symbol of commitment. If it was a gift, then she would keep it, no matter her answer to the question of marriage. Therefore, if the commitment is not entered into and as a result the ring is not accepted by the female...then it stands to reason that if the commitment is later broken and ceases to exist...the ring's meaning no longer exists and it should be returned. But I promise you this...if HE breaks it off...he's NOT getting the ring back. ![]()
__________________ ![]() ~~~ ~~~You can't run with the Texas big dawgs...if you still pee like a puppy. ~~~ ~~~WINNER OF TRACKPAD'S 2005 MOONIE PERVERT AWARD ~~~ ~~~Women and cats will do as they please...men and dogs should get used to it. | |
| | |