![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Chit-Chat Non-debate discussions - uncontroversial topics not covered in other forums , light-hearted, heartwarming, risque, weird news, fun things etc. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) | |||
| Monkey Mouse ![]() | The Democrats run Oregon, so it could happen. Talk about penalizing people for fuel efficient vehicles. Quote:
__________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How May I Help You? ![]() PM me through this link if clicking on those banners doesn't help with your questions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Last edited by Woodmonkey; 03-09-2005 at 19:35. | |||
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Banned ![]() | It's a frightening thought that we would be penalized for being more fuel efficient, isn't it? I don't know about Oregon and commute distances between home and work place, but here in California the mileage can be quite high for those who bought where it was affordable and then chose to make the monstrous commute to the job. It might be effective in California in placing more commuters onto the trains from the far outer limits to the inner cities, but then the next thing we would see would be a tax on that form of transportation to make up for the loss of mileage tax. I think this is totally unacceptable and unfairly targets long-distance commuters with the highest taxes and with no increased public tax benefit. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Junior Officer ![]() | Like a tax??????????? You're kidding right!! Can't help but wonder what the cost to implement this bit of technology will cost and who will foot the bill. [Vehicles would be fitted with a Global Positioning System, or GPS, that can tell when a car is being driven in state and out of state, Mr. Whitty said. When a person fills his gas tank, a device on the gas pump would read the in-state mileage recorded by the car's receiver and send the information to the service station's billing system, eliminating the fuel tax and tacking on the mileage fee] Mr. Whitty doesn't mention what the ongoing maintenance will cost or court costs if people dispute the calculations. Will the up front costs justify the expected end results or will this be another great plan because people will find ways to avoid the capturing of info? Radar detectors come to mind as a means of avoiding technology. Just like in war when weapons are invented anti weapons are thought up. What would prevent people familiar with connecting the device [GPS] from learning how to effectively disconnect it? As for tracking via gas purchase are they going to prohibit people from buying gas for boats, lawn mowers and other gas using equipment that won't be fitted ? Seems to me that Mr. Whitty ought to be investigated 1st. Does the word "Kickback" sound familiar?
__________________ "The only thing that makes life possible is permanent, intolerable uncertainty, not knowing what comes next." Ursula K. Leguin |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Crew Dawg ![]() | I suppose if I had the idea that they were spending our tax money wisely, or even prudently, then new weird taxes wouldn't bother me quite as much as they do... and this one seems truly idiotic.
__________________ http://www.anyairman.com Click banner > Go directly to Air Force forum ![]() "We’re at war with Japan. We were attacked by Japan. Do you want to kill Japanese, or would you rather have Americans killed?" General Curtis LeMay |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Banned ![]() | Uncle Sam, those are the three states considering the tax! With the realization that hybrid vehicles will cut gasoline consumption way, way down, a new tax revenue has to make up for the loss of state income - so why not tax a person not for how much gas they use but rather how many miles they travel to and from work? As a telecommuter, my travel tax would remain very low but for those, for example, who moved out into the low desert where they could afford to purchase and then commute to Los Angeles every day, the thought of what that person pays not only in state income tax but add in a mileage tax and it just may be more family cost effective to just not work at all. The implications of such a tax are really quite staggering for Californians. |
| | |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |