![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| Forums | Register | Groups | Awards | Arcade | Pets | T-Bucks / T-Store | Invite Your Friends | Blogs | Mark Forums Read |
| Army For any current or former soldiers of any Armed Forces. |
Army | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Daft. ![]() | UK troops take over Afghan duties Commanders say they will make a difference to ordinary AfghansA contingent of British forces is due to take over security duties in one of the most dangerous Afghan provinces. The soldiers are replacing US forces in the Taleban-dominated southern province of Helmand, as part of an expansion of peacekeeping operations by Nato. Hundreds of British troops are already in Helmand and the full complement will eventually number more than 3,000. Brigadier Ed Butler, commander of UK forces in the country, said he was well equipped for a "challenging mission". The troops are taking command of Helmand's Provincial Reconstruction Team - one of more than 20 such teams charged with stabilising the country outside of the capital, Kabul. Violence has been increasing in southern Afghanistan and soldiers will be at particular risk from suicide attacks and roadside bombs. Last week Taleban fighters told the BBC they planned to target and kill British troops in Helmand, one commander labelling the British "an old enemy of Afghanistan". 'Fuedal issues' But Brig Butler said the problems his troops face were "more fundamental" than Taleban or al-Qaeda insurgents. UK troops will mostly aid reconstruction efforts in Helmand"We're starting to understand that the nature of the problem is ... about tribal issues, it's about water and land rights, it's about feudal and historical matters." He said British troops had a "very clear" mission and would not go "looking for trouble". He said Britain had made a "long-term commitment" to the country, and he was determined to "make a difference" to the lives of ordinary Afghans. Three elements The Conservatives have called for clarity over Britain's deployment, saying the government has given "confusing" statements on the nature of the mission. Shadow Defence Secretary Liam Fox said he wanted to know if the soldiers would be countering insurgents, or "are they going to be there purely for reconstruction, are they going to be anti-narcotics?" Defence Secretary John Reid denied there was any confusion, saying the mission was "to protect the reconstruction and development of the Afghan economy, democratic government and security forces". He added: "However, it will be necessary to protect that development against terrorists who seek to destroy all three of those elements, or to attack British troops." Monday's handover of power in Helmand was described by the Ministry of Defence as of "symbolic significance" because Britain does not yet have its full task force in the province. The Army's 3,300-strong deployment to Helmand, led by 16 Air Assault Brigade, will be completed by June. There are already about 2,000 British soldiers in Afghanistan as part of the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) and US-led coalition forces. BBC News Link |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DoD U.S. Troops Mentor Afghan Artillery Platoon | Jacklou59 | DOD News Services | 0 | 01-09-2008 20:09 |
| DoD Afghan, U.S. Troops Deliver Aid to Villagers | Jacklou59 | DOD News Services | 0 | 12-26-2007 15:53 |
| [News Feed] Afghan blasts wound U.S. troops, Afghan policemen | Forum Mouse | News Articles | 0 | 07-25-2005 10:00 |
| All 16 U.S. Troops Killed in Afghan Crash | Woodmonkey | News Articles | 4 | 07-01-2005 11:04 |
| Mississippi Guard Troops Handle Varied Duties | RAMESES the Great | DefenseLink | 0 | 06-01-2005 15:25 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |