Kim André Akerĝ wrote:
> robert blake wrote:
>
> > Kim André Akerĝ <kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com> wrote in
> > news:3kagu0FtdsmgU1 @individual.net:
> >
> > > gb7648 wrote:
> > >
> > >> To Google:
> > >>
> > >> Google offers customer services to people who never signed a
> > service >> agreement with Google. The netiquette in no way counts as
> > a service >> agreement. The "like it or not" approach of Google
> > violates human >> rights. Your company needs to remove dependencies
> > of your customer >> services from all users, whose preferred
> > newsreader is not Google. >> Anticompetitive businesses need to
> > adjust to the big market. >> Permanent archiving is not possible
> > legally.
> > >
> > > What customer service are you talking about in particular here?
> > >
> > > If you're talking about "permanent archiving" in terms of the
> > > Usenet archives, Google's not the only one doing this.
> >
> > what others are there?
>
> Google caches pages, too. That's one form of archiving. The same goes
> for Blogger, which is also a Google service now. Not to mention what
> sort of archiving Gmail might be doing.
Hmmm... I might've jumped to the wrong meaning of the term "others"
here. See Gandalf's response on this one.
--
Kim André Akerĝ
-
kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com
(remove NOSPAM to contact me directly)