NOYB wrote:
> On 15-Jul-2005, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>
>
>>>As horrid as the code is on my sites they're ranked at near the top of
>>>the engines,
>>
>>Which proves what?
>>
>>
>>>and being that I'm on other people's computers every day I try to
>>>access my sites and they're all accessible on all sorts of computer
>>>and connections.
>>
>>I sincerely doubt that.
>>
>>
>>>What are the practical real world benfits of having W3 perfect error
>>>free
>>>code?
>>
>>There are many, including that client-side scripts basically
>>will work in a UA (provided they support the respective DOM).
>>
>>If the examples in this group and other newsgroups dealing
>>with Web authoring are not sufficient for you, try Google:
>>
>> <http://www.google.de/search?q=why+valid+code>
>
>
> That link leads to the REAL reason W3C code is so important. Look at the
> prices they charge to correct "bad" code. Make up some BS standard then
> charge people to live up to it $ukers!!!
>
>
> Pricing
>
> Site Size Annual Price (US dollars)
> 1 - 100 pages or frames </toolbox/faq.htm> $60 per URL
> 101 - 400 pages or frames </toolbox/faq.htm> $200 per URL
> Larger than 400 pages or frames </toolbox/faq.htm> See below
> Have custom needs? Click here </toolbox/large_sites.htm>
> Need advanced features? HTML Toolbox Advanced – Gold ($499 per URL) for
> up to 1000 pages or frames HTML Toolbox Advanced – Platinum ($799) for up
> to 5000 pages or frames
>
>
>
Do you work for free? You could always correct your site yourself and
not worry about other businesses.
Have you priced MS server products lately? How about the "eternally
free" IE, that is as long as you're shelling out for the OS.
--
Wayne
http://www.glenmeadows.com