View Single Post
Old 07-16-2005, 16:26   #1 (permalink)
DocDiggs
Crooning Wolf
 
DocDiggs's Avatar
My Awards Rack
Bronze Reputation  Medal Army Service Button Bronze Community Medal 
Total Awards: 3
My Mood
My Mood:
Status
DocDiggs is offline
Post Count
1,920
My Photos
My Photos: 0
Member Flags
England
My Referrals
My Referrals: 0
Personal Guestbook
Reputation +/-
DocDiggs is a glorious beacon of lightDocDiggs is a glorious beacon of lightDocDiggs is a glorious beacon of lightDocDiggs is a glorious beacon of lightDocDiggs is a glorious beacon of lightDocDiggs is a glorious beacon of lightDocDiggs is a glorious beacon of lightDocDiggs is a glorious beacon of lightDocDiggs is a glorious beacon of lightDocDiggs is a glorious beacon of lightDocDiggs is a glorious beacon of light
Other Swag
T-Bucks: 4,546.73
Bank: 0.00
Total T-Bucks: 4,546.73

 
Default There possibly goes the Constitution.

July 16, 2005
Court Gutting in Congress

Congress is quietly considering whether to destroy one of the pillars of constitutional law: the habeas corpus power of the federal courts to determine whether an indigent defendant has been unjustly sentenced to death in state courts. [Italics mine]

A bill making alarming progress in committee would effectively strip federal courts of most review power and shift it to the attorney general. That's right: the chief prosecutor of the United States would become the judge of whether state courts behave fairly enough toward defendants appealing capital convictions. If a state system was certified as up to snuff, then the federal courts would lose their jurisdiction and condemned defendants their last hope.

It is appalling that lawmakers would visit such destruction on a basic human right that's been painfully secured across three centuries of jurisprudence. Repeatedly, federal court scrutiny has laid bare the shoddy state of capital justice in the states. DNA science has drawn attention to the frequency of false convictions.

The injustices of the criminal court process flow considerably from the widespread lack of competent defense counsel in the first place. Yet the proposal would allow state courts greater cover in pronouncing their own flawed convictions as too "harmless and nonprejudicial" to merit further review.

Proponents insist that truly meritorious complaints would somehow survive under this oppressive bill. In fact, it would make the execution of the innocent even more likely than it already is.

Last edited by DocDiggs; 07-16-2005 at 16:30..
DocDiggs is offline   Reply With Quote
Trackpads Information
Click to Visit
 
Page generated in 0.50567 seconds with 17 queries