Lois wrote:
> "Heidi" wrote:
> : But the question comes is what if you miss something important or
> relatively
> : that would have gone to a catch all?
>
> If you don't have a catch-all, emails sent to non-existent addresses
> will bounce, and the sender will know to resend them to the correct
> address. OTOH, if you do have a catch-all, there's a bigger risk
> (IMO) that legit email will get lost among the spam. Also, how often
> do you check a catch-all account?
>
> Personally, I don't want to see spam even in a catch-all account.
> Spammers have a chance of reaching an audience with catch-all
> accounts, but they have no chance if spam is bounced.
>
>
> : Also if you only have so many allotted email accounts you can set
> up
> : as individual email accounts but unlimited aliases then a catch all
> account
> : is
> : a necessary thing.
>
> A limited number of email accounts is not a good thing for some of
> us. But as long as the aliases are unlimited, you can do a lot with
> them.
>
> Lois
>
>
>
I provide a form. If someone really wants to get in contact and they've
never mailed me before, the web form is the first port of call. I use
less obvious (not our names) accounts for our business email addresses.
They're not really guessable.
--
x theSpaceGirl (miranda)
# lead designer @
http://www.dhnewmedia.com #
# remove NO SPAM to email, or use form on website #